Posted on 10/20/2016 7:44:07 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Oh, brother. Talk about yer parsing. These same fake journalist hacks can’t see the obvious fraud and graft in the Clinton machine, but they can read into three words as an aside an entire concession?
Horse crap.
the obama’s don’t “control” nothing except occasionally themselves and their kids.
And that’s what the wicked do to you. They try to pin you down with ginned-up shame and keep your thoughts from moving beyond where they “caught you.”
The bible calls it “Suppressing the truth in unrighteousness.”
That is some way to describe the spin...lol
correct this post
its a opinion column from trimp hater johnny p not an articke
#NeverTrumper John Podhoretz.
I figured as much since cuckservatives don’t want to win.
Slaverishly anticipating a Hillary presidency sends a tingle up their leg.
Just like with the rest of the MSM. As Hillary would say, “what difference does it make.”
I take it this is more hysteria from John Putz?
He has been among the worst of the worst Never Trumpers.
Second generation neocon.
Given the demographics of some parts of New York, I'd say they are going more for "New York Putz", and doing a damned fine job of it too.
-------
Loving all the "in the know" pundits reactions to Trump's non-answer to the question of accepting the results if he loses. I've seen everything from "traitorous" to "unprecedented".
Well, then, does that make Algore "traitorous" when he refused to accept his 2000 loss to Dubya? And of course it's "unprecedented". Has such a question ever been asked of a candidate in the past? If not, there is no precedent for the answer, one way or the other. Of course, the LIV who read the daily fish wrap or listen to the alphabet soup TV snooze will lap this up without knowing the "rest of the story".
What a twisted piece of smarmy logic this is.
Like school yard talk by 11 year olds.
More pea brain logic from the propagandist media.
I figured this was a Podhoretz article, even though the OP left the author out.
I tangled with the guy on Twitter yesterday. As adamant a #NeverTrumper as you will encounter.
It’s more dismaying that the GOPe crowd is like this, than that the Democrats are.
Why of course the Democrats are for Hillary, or at least are expected to be.
One would THINK the GOPe crowd would at least try to be prudential about their support. Instead they find their inner purists.
>> Will you accept a Clinton victory...
Fighters don’t respond to such stupid questions
BARF ALERT!
That a woman who has been politically active, all her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bain of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government woujld rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she tottally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most-- pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
Don’t denigrate schools by associating them with this sort of palaver!
This is like a know-it-all big brother lording it over a little brother.
Not at the level at which they were presented, no.
The writer is a complete moron.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.