There are no words...
Posted on 10/20/2016 8:56:59 AM PDT by GilGil
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says nearly 13,000 fully developed babies who could survive outside the womb are aborted annually.
And – contrary to the false claims made by Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton during Wednesday evening’s debate – few, if any, of those abortions occurred because of the “life and health of the mother” or “something terrible” being discovered about the pregnancy.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
And about half of those are black babies.
Remember, black lives matter.
*
What on earth would motivate a woman to do this? There doesn’t seem to be any logic in waiting this long. Pure evil indeed.
We did a poll of 13,000 babies murdered in late-term abortions last year and 100% said, “Please don’t kill me.”
‘... few, if any, of those abortions occurred because of the “life and health of the mother” or “something terrible” being discovered about the pregnancy.’
Im going to kill you b/c I dont want the responsibility or cost. Its nothing more complex than that.
And then people freak out because Cecil the lion was killed.
It’s only 13k. And Hillary and gang are okay with it. I mean, it’s not something that important like polar bears, or second hand smoke, or plastic bags.
From the very beginning:
It’s alive.
The chromosomes tell you it’s human.
It’s completely viable as long as it stays exactly where it is supposed to be.
And they are OK killing that baby.
Whether it is a “clump of cells” or “fully developed”, it is the same being. A living human baby.
And they are OK with killing that baby. It might seem “procedural” early on, but they are equally fine with pulling the child part way out of the birth canal and cutting the brainstem just before the head emerges. That’s just no big deal for Hillary. Because some humans are inconvenient — so kill them.
@
Ask someone who is pro-abortion: ‘If you had been aborted at 12 weeks, and your mother had another baby a year later, would that be you?’ Any right-minded person would say, “No, it would not be me.”
‘So then you are saying that you, as a unique person, would never have lived. Then each aborted baby is a soul that never got the chance at life that you have. Is that fair?’
This is not about a fetus, or unformed tissue mass. It is about a unique human soul. Each one of us has as much right to live as anyone else, and we should give every baby a chance at life.
“The chromosomes tell you it’s human.”
Yes, and not only a human, but a unique individual whose life force builds its own body. It gets nothing further from the mother except nutrition, protection and love - the things every human needs to exist.
Ping
Color has nothing to do with the murder of innocent human beings. This is savagery at its worst, led by the politicians of death and hatred for other human lives.
Demonrats = culture of death...
113,000 babies are Butchered daily around the world.
This is 3 Million a Month...
36 Million a year...
Imagine the L.A. Coliseum filled to capacity and then some, where babies are slaughtered each and every day around the world...
Not against sex, but geez Louise, can men just wear the damn condom and/or women say NO once in awhile?
so ashamed on my species... :(
For all who understand the underlying premise of the Declaration of Independence--that our rights, as individuals, are inalienable precisely, and only, because they are endowed by the Creator--then, Trump's remarks which elicited exposure of Clinton's unequivocal commitment to the 20th Century "progressive" notion of destroying the life and liberty of children in the womb makes him the winner.
In America, our constitutional protections rest on the Founders' premise that each and all individuals are "endowed by their Creator" with the unalienable right to both life and the liberty to enjoy it, or, in their words, "the pursuit of happiness."
The sole reason these rights were deemed unalienable is that both are derived from the Creator--not from the mother or father, and not from government or judicial decision. What is "granted" by human decision also can, by implication, be withheld.
"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them (life and liberty)," said Thomas Jefferson.
"The world is different now. . . and yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forefathers fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God." - John F. Kennedy, Inaugural Address
That understanding underlies every other consideration embodied in our Declaration of Independence and every protection of our Constitution. It is the very basis of our rights to life and liberty, of laws to protect them, and it distinguishes ours from other forms of government.
When we fail to acknowledge that foundation of our liberty, then we risk liberty itself for future generations, for where does the right to choose who lives and who does not really end?
That is why the question is of vital importance in each election. Already, we have deprived millions of their Creator-endowed rights to life and liberty, and our nation must be weaker for their loss. We need leaders who understand the implications and potential consequences of departing from our founding principles.
In recent decades, technological advances have enabled us to observe the characteristics and actions of God's tiniest creations in the womb. Unlike previous generations who could not see, we have no excuse for imagining that these are mere blobs of tissue labeled "fetuses." In their early weeks, we now can see that they are living babies who will continue on to possess life and liberty if we do not "destroy" both. Indeed, they are simply smaller versions of ourselves.
Clinton's clever semantic maneuver which conflates "women's health" with the death of a viable and distinct "other" masks an agenda that is not consistent with the underlying principles of the Framers' Constitutional protections for liberty.
God help us! We need revival!!
Narcissism.
You can bet Hillary will give more federal money to the abortion industry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.