Posted on 10/20/2016 3:11:20 PM PDT by detective
But she is always there for the children.
If she and progressives were consistent//sarc, and this matter is to their way of thinking entirely a matter that should be left to the woman and her doctor then she would be in favor of limiting the FDA’s role strictly to advising about product safety for the general public and no longer deny access to treatments. If a cancer patient and his MD are looking to try an unapproved and even potentially harmful treatment they should not have to go to another nation or to the, if you will, back alleys of medicine to try it. If a surgical procedure might improve quality of life why should the govt say no, not until it is approved in two years. These are personal medical situations that affect only the patient, unlike abortion which affects much more.
Amen!
And yet the Government inserts itself in every other aspect of our lives. But when it comes to the slaughter of the unborn..
>“Government Shouldn’t Step In”
Gov’t stepped-in it when it created a ‘right’ out of thin air which directly contradicted the Rights of all Men (”...*Life*, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness...”).
Course, what does one expect from the logical shallows of those supporting killing a baby in utero while championing the abolition of the death penalty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.