Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jch10

The gov’t shouldn’t step in. ...except to pay for abortions with tax payer money, right, Hillary?


9 posted on 10/20/2016 3:23:49 PM PDT by jch10 (Stand strong! we have a country to save!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: jch10

If she and progressives were consistent//sarc, and this matter is to their way of thinking entirely a matter that should be left to the woman and her doctor then she would be in favor of limiting the FDA’s role strictly to advising about product safety for the general public and no longer deny access to treatments. If a cancer patient and his MD are looking to try an unapproved and even potentially harmful treatment they should not have to go to another nation or to the, if you will, back alleys of medicine to try it. If a surgical procedure might improve quality of life why should the govt say no, not until it is approved in two years. These are personal medical situations that affect only the patient, unlike abortion which affects much more.


62 posted on 10/21/2016 8:55:15 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson