Posted on 10/20/2016 8:40:53 PM PDT by brucedickinson
Go to Google, type in "Hillary 4 minute nukes," or some variation thereof, and you will be guided to a first choice from "Snopes," the "fact-checking" site of the Democrats. Apparently, what Hillary said wasn't classified at all. She committed no crime and we can all sleep easier.
(Excerpt) Read more at snopes.com ...
Note the “expert” is NPR’s goto guy Joe Cirincione - lefty all the way for years.
Sure, the pentagon folks have no idea what’s classified and what isn’t.
No wait,...that’s Hillary. C is for Cookie, right, sweetie-pie?
But as I said in my other response, you can't go talking about that stuff unless it is officially declassified.
It needs to be on a diet as bad as her.
What Hillary said and revealed to the world was that the time from launch order to actual missile launch is 4 minutes.
If it was classified, how would they know? Do either of them have a security clearance or work for the Pentagon?
F'n blind tools.
So, they’re lesbians?
As SOS, She would have had that information.
Hey, Snopes must be correct. I mean, Andrea Mitchelle thinks so. That’s good enough for me! And the FBI, why, they’d be all over it if it were true!
LOL!
The Revolution is ON!
Vote Trump!
LOL
That is how it works in any household with cats
People serve cats, not the other way around
And not just a security clearance. Even if you have a clearance you can't just browse through everything at that level.
Snopes is good for looking up "Is that cat really that big?"
But anything dealing with politics they are complete left wing hacks.
(and the answers are no for the white cat and yes for the yellow one)
Snopes is basing its article on a different proposition from what Hillary said. That a president has about 4 minutes following detecting a nuclear attack on us, to order retaliation. That is not what she said. Probably she had no idea what she said.
The cat is probably the one who does all the heavy lifting...
Snopes is so far left you can’t even find them.
But no, there’s no bias there at all.
/sarc
They took less than 4 minutes to defend her with a lengthy article, on a subject different from what she said. Maybe they should handle our nuclear codes. The real takeaway is she screwed up the topic. Any president will retaliate if told a strike is on its way.
I have seen a pattern in how snopes gets a false rating on stuff they don’t want people to know is true. They find a version of the true story that was botched...that got some facts wrong or added parts that weren’t real. Then instead of rating the real story they rate the botched one as false.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.