Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chaosagent

OK, but why would the CNG offer bonuses it knew weren’t approved or funded? None of this is adding up, frankly.

I’m not arguing that the soldiers didn’t deserve every last penny, just that there’s something fishy along the line here. I know when my son joined the Army (not the Guard) he had a contract. He committed to a certain MOS, and to serve for four years; the Army promised him $X, in writing, if he fulfilled the contract. How did the CNG make promises, not put it in writing, as part of the reenlistment effort? Didn’t the soldiers have any kind of contract? It was all just wide open?


67 posted on 10/23/2016 11:50:29 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

The top brass at the CNG offered the ‘extra’ bonuses to meet reenlistment levels that they were suppose to meet. Otherwise enough soldiers weren’t reenlisting.

Either the CNG brass thought is was OK, or that they could get away with it and the US government wouldn’t notice.

Note that it did take them 10-12 years to track it down.

Apparently most/all? of them had contracts for the extra amount, but the US says that the fact the CNG wasn’t supposed to offer these extra amounts means the contracts weren’t valid.

And one soldier is being required to pay back his entire $20K bonus because he no longer has his copy of the contract, and they can’t find one for him either.

So they want ‘all’ the bonus back.


68 posted on 10/23/2016 2:01:37 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson