To: unixfox; varyouga; NonValueAdded
“Sure she can. And Ford proved it.”
Those were my initial thoughts, but I read somewhere on FR recently claiming Nixons pardon was never challenged in court, thinking the shame of resigning was enough punishment. Of course, I am not a lawyer and I have been baffled by legal ‘reasoning’ in the past. It seems a pardon without prior conviction would at least show implication of guilt of past crimes. And a blanket pardon going forward? What then is in place to prevent Obama from pardoning Roberts from shooting Trump upon giving him the oath of office? I don’t see that as a straw man, or much of a stretch, for that matter, but again, I’m no lawyer, so please excuse my lay-person reasoning. (...and my inability to avoid run-on sentences.)
48 posted on
10/23/2016 8:59:13 AM PDT by
bk1000
(A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
To: bk1000
Hey, that reminds me, Bill Clinton pardoned Fife Symington before he was convicted so they just dropped the case. But as you note they didn't challenge the premise of pre-pardon.
RINO Symington paid back Bill by supporting Hillary Clinton, saying "attacks against her were political."
51 posted on
10/23/2016 9:06:06 AM PDT by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: bk1000
See the Heritage Foundation's treatment of
Pardon Power. It answers these questions.
55 posted on
10/23/2016 9:18:41 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson