This couldn’t have been Wikileaks - it’s only from/about the last three weeks of the election. Sounds like THIS election. There is no evidence on this site that it originates from any camp, nothing to show legitimacy at all. Wikileaks is a known high caliber hacking group.
Not that this doesn’t sound about right, no shocker there, and they are right about the intelligence and fighting level of Reddit’s Donald sub. But their little polls and disinfo attempts wouldn’t faze the fight. Not here or there.
The blog needs to say a line about where/how they got it and who it’s from and to... even if they can’t reveal actual sources, they can say what that is supposed to be. Or it isn’t worth looking at.
Agree. See my post 118.