ping
You still have to ask? No. It won’t make a difference, because most the media is in open collusion with the Socialists.
If Hillary conducted satanic rituals in which she sacrificed and ate babies in the forest and the media doesn’t report it, does it exist?
They would if they were receiving wider coverage, but they aren’t, which is proof of the media bias conservatives have complained about for years.
they make a good difference if they get distrubed and seen
but unforunately the mass media is in the Tank for HilLIARy
and there is no mass media coverage of any of the bad things she’s done
none. instead, each hourly newscast begins with yet another ‘pro-HilLIARy’ propaganda story......to brainwash the masses to vote for Her Corruptess AND IT IS WORKING!!!
it is up to us to get the word out....on a massive scale...
to everyone ...
So the choices are: 1) no, due to media collusion and not reporting or 2) yes, because they are going viral.
My answer is: Yes, due to alternate routes being available and the news still getting out, but the % impact is unknown because we are still learning the impact of viral vs MSM.
Unfortunately that option isn’t available so I said yes, as I felt it was closest to my real opinion. current results are 55% no, 45% yes.
(((Media)))
I’d guess not unless he has one of her own tape doing something reprehensible.
The people who can connect the dots are already pro Trump or pro Lucifer.
Sadly, exposing Acorn did not stop Obama win. We can only hope and pray and repeat the word!
Fortunately, most people are on to the media bias and are getting more information from the Internet, especially social media. Let’s quit saying it doesn’t matter and make sure we are doing our part to MAKE IT MATTER.
It will only make a difference if it leads to immediate and direct involvement by the FEC or FBI (arrest).
Otherwise, as we see in current threads even here on FR, the illegality of this transfer appears to be questionable.
To the average voter, I suspect that the only thing he proved on video was that you can pay to get direct access to Obama or Hillary.
Okeef’s first 3 videos had far more impact with the viewer because they contain undeniable collusion to incite violence.
It resonates more.
The videos have a similar effect as the IRS had on conservative groups. Okeefe and Wikileaks have slowed down the Super PACS, the DNC, and the Hillary campaign right at the end of the election. They have caused internal disruption and paranoia because everybody is in CYA mode wondering if they have been hacked or recorded too. Email communication has slowed to nothing. The media coordination has slowed too. Their names are in the emails. The lights came on and the rats are scurrying. At the same time voter fraud has become a topic of conversation even for Obama.
The point is to slow down the Hillary campaign and lessen the vote fraud.
I think what this information does is just reinforce how crooked Hillary is. These reminders are good. Don’t let up the pressure.
If he’s got more than he’s shown, he should just put it all out there—the voting is ongoing.
Yes, he’s probably made more of a difference than any of us have, but not as much as we could have wished for.
If they go viral, and get to the libs, Michael Moore’s two videos will influence the fence sitters much better.
No.
They are too late, and the folks we need to persuade, LIVs and ‘undecideds’ are unlikely to have time to understand them.
Also, a lot of folks have voted already.
Sally Sweetlies and “If we don’t report it, it never happened” would be appropriate here!
The O’Keefe videos might not make much difference in the election, but they will sure as hell make a difference in the lawsuits that follow after Trump wins! Good times ahead!
Yes because hopefully a lot of the truly “undecided” are more influenced by social and alternative media so they know what’s going on
Bernie’s peeps ought to see Assange and O’Keefe as heroes