Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why de Blasio’s Excessive Spending May Come to an End
New York Post ^ | October 30, 2016 | Nicole Gelinas

Posted on 10/30/2016 9:31:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Wall Street is doing well.

That’s usually good news for the city budget. This year, though, it comes with bad news.

The industry’s first increase in profits in four years isn’t exactly flooding the city’s coffers with cash. So it may not be enough of a revenue boost to counteract the other fiscal force at work: Mayor de Blasio is fast increasing spending, particularly on City Workers.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/30/2016 9:31:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Despite the popular notion that rich people don’t pay taxes, bankers provide 18.5 percent of the state’s taxes, and 7 percent of the city’s.

This is only direct taxes on Wall Street profits. What about its many workers?

Killing the Federal Reserve will kill the Left and all their social engineering schemes. Here is direct evidence. Very ironically, have a marxist mayor of NYC, who only exists because he schemes are paid for by Wall Street. Wall Street, and its financialization of the US economy, is supported by the Federal Reserve.

2 posted on 10/30/2016 9:43:12 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Guessing: NYC is totally bankrupt?


3 posted on 10/30/2016 10:43:36 PM PDT by MasterGunner01 ( To err is human, to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

This issue arose during the 2007-08 financial collapse, when both the mayor of NYC and the governor of NY state wanted the bailed-out banks to continue paying bonuses to executives (even if they had to use taxpayer funds to do so); both entities were so hooked on their tax “cut” of those bonuses that they had them built into their budgets.

The implications of what they sought (direct transfers from taxpayers to executives) meant nothing to them; they needed to get paid.


4 posted on 10/31/2016 4:02:08 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Running out of other people’s money.


5 posted on 10/31/2016 8:15:52 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson