Skip to comments.
Missouri:Senate Race Remains Neck and Neck; Trump Widens Edge for President (52%T - 38%C)
www.monmouth.edu ^
| Tuesday, November 01, 2016
Posted on 11/01/2016 11:23:48 AM PDT by 11th_VA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Trump also has a lead among white women of 52% to 39%, a group that was evenly divided at 42% to 42% two weeks ago.
I'm telling you, the dam has busted ...
1
posted on
11/01/2016 11:23:48 AM PDT
by
11th_VA
To: 11th_VA
Missouri is the indicator state.
2
posted on
11/01/2016 11:26:20 AM PDT
by
lurk
(TEat)
To: 11th_VA
Since when has a 52/38 lead been described as an “edge”? That’s a mountain range.
3
posted on
11/01/2016 11:27:41 AM PDT
by
Damifino
(The true measure of a man is found in what he would do if he knew no one would ever find out.)
To: lurk
Not this year.
There's some strong anti-incumbent sentiment across this country, and this puts a lot of Republicans at risk in these races.
Also, Missouri has a bizarre governor's race where the Democrat is a former Republican who has the support of the NRA and sounds more conservative than his opponent. LOL.
4
posted on
11/01/2016 11:28:13 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: 11th_VA
Corruption kills.........campaigns
5
posted on
11/01/2016 11:30:07 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: Alberta's Child
We need to keep that Senate seat even if Blunt isa RINO. Dodge the bullet please.
6
posted on
11/01/2016 11:30:35 AM PDT
by
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
To: Admin Moderator
The title should say “Missouri”
7
posted on
11/01/2016 11:31:47 AM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: DIRTYSECRET
I agree with you. I’m just explaining why there seems to be some large gaps between the support for Trump and the support for Republican Senate candidates in some of these tight races.
8
posted on
11/01/2016 11:33:11 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
To: 11th_VA
I cannot see how as Tony Rodham’s son puts it vote for that “malignant aunt” of mine.
9
posted on
11/01/2016 11:33:19 AM PDT
by
MIchaelTArchangel
(A Vote for Hillary is a Vote for ISIS!)
To: 11th_VA
Note that Trump enjoys a 14% lead while Blunt who is part of Spineless McConnell's "leadership" team is in a dead heat as is the Republican candidate for Missouri governor (a Navy SEAL who probably deserves better).
Trump has closed his case quite successfully. Blunt is a whore for the US Chambers of Crony Commerce. The fellow running for governor should be running away with it but suffers from the crony "capitalist" uber alles image of the GOP. He should campaign HARD for Trump and separate himself from the Chamber and go for the win!
10
posted on
11/01/2016 11:40:32 AM PDT
by
BlackElk
(Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Rack 'em, Danno!)
To: DIRTYSECRET
When do we start purging the big business marionettes who make up the overwhelming majority of the “GOP” Senate caucus or do we share power with these whores forever so they can pad their pockets at our expense?
11
posted on
11/01/2016 11:43:27 AM PDT
by
BlackElk
(Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Rack 'em, Danno!)
To: BlackElk
Since when has a 52/38 lead been described as an edge? Thats a mountain range.
Its an edge because the dems are going over it!
12
posted on
11/01/2016 11:43:30 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
To: BlackElk
Nice to come across your posts old friend
13
posted on
11/01/2016 11:46:00 AM PDT
by
MattinNJ
(It's over Johnny. The America you knew is gone. Denial serves no purpose.)
To: 11th_VA
14
posted on
11/01/2016 11:50:47 AM PDT
by
Ravi
To: 11th_VA
It must be cuz Monmouth hates Trump. If and when they admit anything good for Trump it must chap their asses.
To: Ravi
Only D+1—no wonder Trump has such a large lead.
16
posted on
11/01/2016 11:54:39 AM PDT
by
cgbg
(Another World War I veteran for Hillary!)
To: 11th_VA
Sorry Missouri, but you’ll have to wait to primary this SOB in 6 years. On 8 November, we need even RINOs in the US Senate.
17
posted on
11/01/2016 11:58:34 AM PDT
by
Rockitz
(This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: 11th_VA
If he’s up by 14 in Missouri it’s over. Missouri isn’t a perfect indicator but it’s about as close as you’ll get.
To: DIRTYSECRET
Yeah, I think Blunt is a flawed candidate for many reasons, partly because he hasn't really done much since he's been in the Senate.
And Kander comes across pretty good in his commercials, playing up his military service. But the truth is that once in Washington, Kander would be a rubber stamp for the far left Democrat Party. And we have already donated one vote to that miserable cause when McCaskill got lucky when Todd Akin flubbed his Senate campaign.
There are a lot of ads trying to tie Kander to Hillary, but I think it needs to be clear that Kander is tied to the whole Democrat Party.
To: 11th_VA
If Trump really does win MO by near that margin, it’s game over for Hillary.
20
posted on
11/01/2016 12:16:33 PM PDT
by
boycott
(S)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson