Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: FBI Now 99% Certain at Least 5 Foreign Agencies Hacked Into Hillary’s Server
Gateway Pundit ^ | 11/2/2016 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 11/02/2016 5:16:33 PM PDT by GilGil

FBI Now 99% Certain at Least 5 Foreign Agencies Hacked Into Hillary’s Server

Lou Dobbs: Investigators are now, as I said to you at the outset, 99% sure that as many as five foreign intelligence agencies were able to hack into the Clinton email server.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; clinton; dsj02; election; fbi; hillarysemails; totallycompromised; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-202 next last
To: Mad_as_heck
this whole server thing could have been the idea of enemy spies in the first place....

It appears Hillary and her RATs ARE enemy spies.

161 posted on 11/02/2016 7:57:20 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Crooked Hillary is Goin' down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
In a way what's happening now is better because it looks like more corrupt players will be exposed and removed and President Trump will more effectively drain the swamp and get real change happening for America, MAGA!!!

An open letter to Sergey Brin, Warren Buffett, Tim Cook, Mark Cuban, Jack Dorsey, Bill Gates III, Larry Page, George Soros, Tom Steyer, Mark Zuckerberg and other multi-billionaires that openly supported Hillary Clinton: you BETTER have your lawyers on retainer and likely speed dial. You will all be investigated by one Rudulf William Louis Giuliani (very likely Trump's Attorney General) and it could get really ugly....

162 posted on 11/02/2016 7:57:29 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

That’s true- Our enemies hardly need to steal secrets from the Clintons when they will just sell them if the price was right.


163 posted on 11/02/2016 8:00:27 PM PDT by Mad_as_heck (The MSM - America's (domestic) public enemy #1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I’d say Saudi Arabia or Iran would have a motive, if perhaps not the means — at least directly.


164 posted on 11/02/2016 8:02:06 PM PDT by Crolis ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it." -GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

>>> bet the ones that paid her millions for the information are pissed they couldn’t get it for free from hacking.

My guess is this is how pay for play actually worked in some cases. You pay, and we coach you on how to break our server to retrieve the data.

While the private server may have been in part motivated for convenience (over security), I think more likely is that it was the conduit for passing info to foreign entities. And this way, by occurring in the form of a hack, they can (and have) say that “it was a mistake” and any disclosures were “inadvertent.” It’s all CYA.


165 posted on 11/02/2016 8:06:58 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

>>> I can’t imagine all this info is being leaked without Comey’s ok.

I imagine Comey is almost a hostage of the other agents, who can probably destroy him, too, with dirt on his own crookedness. I presume, in one sense, he is going along with the leaks, but only after his colleagues performed the spine transplant. In return, he will be allowed to resign when the dust settles, with his pension and name intact.


166 posted on 11/02/2016 8:11:59 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TBall

Hazel O’Leary just started declassifying nuclear secrets willy-nilly, in her own words trying to declassify as much as she could before anyone could stop her.


167 posted on 11/02/2016 8:12:46 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
God works in mysterious ways but for the Republic to be saved by Weiner’s weiner is just too much. Who says God does not have a sense of humor.

It will get much much better.

Looks like it is kicking off with a Divine Rectification for Mel Brooks 'not being able to make a movie today'.

168 posted on 11/02/2016 8:17:02 PM PDT by Ezekiel (All who mourn the destruction of America merit the celebration of her rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

LOL. In Trump’s voice: “That I can tell you!...BIGLY!”

He’s obviously known for year it’s been extremely corrupt, but man, these past 18 months still must have been something of a shock to him.

I think he’s been “taking names” and will be ready to kick some serious a$$ on the first minute of the first day.

MUST. GET. MORE. POPCORN. BIGLY.


169 posted on 11/02/2016 8:18:37 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available 4 FREE at CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: GilGil
Dobbs said "as many as", which means the opposite of what's said in the titles of this thread and the Gateway Pundit article ("Investigators are now, as I said to you at the outset, 99% sure that as many as five foreign intelligence agencies [my italics] were able to hack into the Clinton email server"). "At least" sets a lower limit of five. "As many as" sets an upper limit of five. These are not mathematical subtleties, just common sense English. ¿Hablan inglés?
170 posted on 11/02/2016 8:20:43 PM PDT by GJones2 (Let's pay attention to the basic meanings of words: "at least" isn't equal to "as many as")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GJones2
I'm assuming that Dobbs intends the lower limit to be one, but technically zero to five would not be inconsistent with "as many as" five. Also to use "99%" with "as many as" is ridiculous. I could say I'm 99.9% sure that as many as 100 foreign agencies hacked the account. All I've done is set an upper limit to the range, when it's the lower end of the range that matters most. If the investigators are 99% sure that at least one foreign agency hacked the account, and maybe as many as five did, then that's what Dobbs should have said.

It's frustrating for me to try to understand what a story means when the persons reporting it use simple English words so carelessly. If Dobbs has good sources in the FBI that are nearly certain that at least one foreign agency (and maybe up to five) hacked the account, then I want to know it. Statements like "99% sure that as many as five" only serve to undermine my confidence in the story (and misrepresentations like "at least 5" are even worse).

171 posted on 11/02/2016 8:21:39 PM PDT by GJones2 (Let's pay attention to the basic meanings of words: "at least" isn't equal to "as many as")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

After he reopened the investigation. But she knew it advance it was going to be a no bill. It’s all coming home to roost now, she’s already been run over by the bus.


172 posted on 11/02/2016 8:32:57 PM PDT by Bayou City
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
What is on Anthony Weiner's laptop could blow open a scandal of STAGGERING proportions. Imagine taking down not only much of the US Government, but also taking down many large corporations and possibly a huge fraction of the Hollywood Left. We're talking something that would make every other political scandal in the past 500 years combined reduced to insignificance.
173 posted on 11/02/2016 8:37:13 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Mad_as_heck

“maybe she was on a bike...”

Back-pedaling, for sure...


174 posted on 11/02/2016 8:38:17 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Memo to Hitlery and Podesta: the 60mm mortar can be used as a direct fire weapon.


175 posted on 11/02/2016 8:40:34 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thefixisin

I gotta believe Trump saying “You would be in jail.” emboldens those good FBI patriots.


176 posted on 11/02/2016 8:40:42 PM PDT by polymuser (Enough is enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

>”BIGLY”

Maybe you’re joking, but for persons who believe that Trump’s saying “bigly” I’ll add that if you listen to the instances in which he speaks slowly, you’ll probably be able to hear “big league” (which means about the same, though). I’ve heard some recordings in which I can hear it. Also when Trump was asked which he said by a reporter for the Catholic Eternal World Television Network, he answered “big league” (though maybe people misheard his answer, and he was really saying “bigly” :-).


177 posted on 11/02/2016 8:48:03 PM PDT by GJones2 (Trump says "big league" not "bigly")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

“True dat!” as scHillary would say when pandering to blacks


178 posted on 11/02/2016 9:00:04 PM PDT by thefixisin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: GJones2

Joking BIGLY. Saw the EWTN interview.


179 posted on 11/02/2016 9:01:34 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available 4 FREE at CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: GJones2

FWIW - I believe Dobbs was quoting Brett who was the one who said Fox news has (paraphrased) two reliable sources in the FBI that said the following....

The 99% certainty was from those sources as reported by Fox - not Dobbs.


My take (not directed at you)

I would urge all of us to be careful. There is SO MUCH EVIDENCE and stench that we know to be reliable with corroboration that there is no need for people to get carried away. I am reading some really crazy stuff when the truth is crazy enough!

There are too many articles that appear baseless to me from questionable sources based on rumors. We don’t need it - we have the truth and it is more than enough. Let’s get the truth out - if that is not bad enough at this point for people to make up their mind we are enabling them to create doubt with all of the “they exported 1.8B to a middle east bank” or “Hillary molested little girls” or whatever.

We should all concentrate on truth and ignore the rest of this clickbait crap.... the cat is out of the bag and it appears to be enough for the American voters. We damage our own credibility and the real case (that would win in court) with the same baseless and outlandish stories regurgitated over and over.

Just my .02 and this has been the greatest week of politics in my lifetime - I truly can’t remember anything like it and I am far more optimistic now that justice will prevail and I will be happy with the outcome, but let’s not tear our own credibility down on a bunch of clickbait crap. I don’t trust the MSM, but too many people are posting crap from bloggers, tweeters, and youtubers as if it is gospel.


180 posted on 11/02/2016 9:07:44 PM PDT by volunbeer (Clinton Cash = Proof of Corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson