Posted on 11/04/2016 9:04:29 PM PDT by Red Steel
Broward County Florida Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes, left, and Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during a campaign rally at Rev Samuel Deleove Memorial Park on November 1, 2016 in Ft Lauderdale, Florida.
According to multiple sources and witnesses, Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes and employees are engaging in mass voter fraud in multiple forms. While People’s Pundit Daily has uncovered instances of election fraud in other counties around the state–including Pasco and Lee–Broward is large enough that it could potentially swing the state.
It has been widely reported that black turnout in the state–and in other battleground states such as North Carolina and Ohio–is way down from 2012 levels. In the past few days, the Clinton campaign and their Democratic surrogates have been touting “a surge” in turnout among black voters in Broward County, which is overseen by Snipes.
But according to our multiple sources, there has been no real improvement in enthusiasm on the ground, but rather bold voter fraud schemes carried out by employees at the Supervisor of Elections. The election fraud scheme is mutli-pronged and includes destroying ballots selectively and what is traditionally known as ballot-stuffing, or filling in absentee ballots.
“There is no authentic surge,” a source at the Broward County Supervisor of Elections told People’s Pundit Daily. “They’ve been at this [filling out absentee ballots] for days, working 4 to 5 employees some 16 hours a day each. There’s no telling how many ballots we are talking about. As many as they can each write in 16 hours a piece.”
A review of the early and absentee voting statistics in the state–which People’s Pundit Daily does on a daily basis–does reveal a suspicous increase in Democratic returns juxtaposed to the rest of the state, which has not experienced the same turnout increase. If enthusiasm and turnout for Mrs. Clinton was organic and legitimate, then we would expect to see those gains in similiar percentages in regions of the state expected to back the Democrat.
But that’s not the case.
Sources confirm Snipes was breaking the law and opened more than 153,000 ballots cast by mail in private, claiming employees were tearing up and disposing of those that were votes in support of Donald J. Trump. The law prohibits the opening of ballots without the supervision of a canvassing board appointed to oversee and certify elections precisely because of this possibility.
The Republican Party of Florida earlier in the week caught wind of this and accused Broward County election officials of voter fraud when they received a letter Wednesday afternoon from Republican state party chairman Blaise Ingoglia.
“These illegal actions must stop immediately,” he wrote. “The Republican Party of Florida is prepared to take all necessary legal actions to ensure that Broward County conducts its election in compliance with the law.”
Within hours of receiving Ingoglia’s letter, a judge on Broward’s canvassing board offered a two-step compromise that ended the charge by Republicans. But Snipes admitted no wrongdoing and, until now, was able to maintain the story that the employees didn’t open the ballots.
“The canvassing board has never opened the ballots,” Snipes said. “We have procedures we follow that are approved in our security manual sent to state. We don’t feel like we are doing anything illegal — this is the process we have always used.”
But it was only because David Shestokas, a Florida Bar-certified attorney, was sent by the Republican National Lawyers Association from Chicago to watch the election in Broward that these activities were made known.
Yet another allegation involves Voter Services and Registration Director Mary Hall, one of four employees a volunteer identified in a signed affidavit. The volunteer confirms the allegations made by a source claiming Hall and others were locked in a room filling in scores of absentee ballots for Mrs. Clinton and other Democratic candidates.
The volunteer, who was terminated ubruptly after witnessing the mass voter fraud operation in what employees called “The Pitney Bowes Room,” stated in their affidavit that they clearly saw these four individuals filling in “stacks” of ballots with the same pen given by the Supervisor of Elections to voters.
“Once in the room, I could see the four SEO employees sitting at the same table actively filling out election ballots,” the affidavit reads. “Each had a stack of blank ballots to the right of them (about an inch high) and a stack of completed ballots to their left… I could see that the bubbles on the right stack had not been filled in, while the bubbles on the left stack had been blackened in.”
“I could see that the SEO employees were using the same black pens (white body with a black cap) that the SOE supplies to voters at the polling sites. I was then told to leave the room by one of the employees.”
When the volunteer returned the next day, they were met by uniformed security guards and told they had been terminated.
The Trump campaign is allegely preparing a lawsuit against Snipes.
He knows a whole lot more than they think.
And who is going to manage the cameras?
Where are Gov Scott and Pam Bondi on this???
Bookmark
Open, brazen fraud that must be confronted and stopped. If Trump were to lose Florida by 20,000-30,000 votes, he should never concede.
“Why isn’t the Broward County Sheriff’s Department preparing to arrest Snipes and her whole staff? “
Why? Because this is just further evidence or the Just Us System and the Sheriff is part of the action.
Scott Israel is the most politicized sheriff in the history of Broward County.
Bump!!
“Election fraud should carry either 20-to-life or the death penalty. They’re stealing my vote, and I won’t have it! GD scumbags!”
Election fraud is basically treason. It should carry a penalty of a firing squad.
If Anon Larper is right, the old school fraud (shadow-voting, multiple-voting) starts getting hard to conceal right around 10%. That used to be the “too big to cheat” margin.
The electronic machines are problematic, because votes don’t need to be manufactured, they can just be straight-up stolen. If the info is correct, they will be set to cap Trump at around 44%. More than that and the Trump votes will be flipped to H to maintain the ratio. This can be circumvented with paper ballots, since that would take them out of the electronic tally and thus not count toward the Trump “hard cap” after which votes will flip.
In California there was a huge discrepancy in the D primary between paper count and electronic count. Since Bernie was never intended to win, he didn’t pursue it. We will have to, and the paper trail is essential.
If 2 out of 10 Trump voters will vote on paper, we can effectively “neutralize” the electronic fraud and get back to roughly even (H max 56%, DJT 44%, and DJT paper 11% or more). 3 out of 10 would all but guarantee a win. This assumes the actual numbers on the ground nationwide are 55-35 which seems a conservative estimation based on many criteria discussed elsewhere (all the polls have fraud baked in, they are garbage).
1) If you have electronic voting DO NOT USE IT. Request a paper ballot as is your right. Remember, 3 out of 10 votes withheld from the e-systems tally will make the landslide too big to cheat under the proposed e-fraud methodology.
2) Do not vote early no matter the device. Early voting gives the D’s targets for the level of old-school fraud ballots to be manufactured and shadow-voted. Deny them information, and time.
The level of fraud currently going on is too big to hide and it still won’t be enough. They will need to go full Venezuela. Make them push it to the max, take reckless risks, catch them in the crime.
But let’s face it, your analysis is extremely poor. The type of behavior you describe taking place in Walmart is found as much in white women as it is in black.
That will be my new tagline.
Let me see if this fixes that.
Has this all been sent to Trump
Is something going to happend to stop this?
That was a rumor started by Roger Stone who has since retracted it.
Meant to say happen
The punishment should fit the crime. No less than 5 years on a hard labor work farm for each fraudulent vote cast. Clearly these people would all be working for free for the rest of their miserable lives as it should be. Voter fraud is only slightly less bad than murder.
Gore tried in 2000 to have only certain counties’ votes recounted seeking advantage. Trump should request that if the country of Broward’s votes are too fraudulent to determine the true vote, that the whole county gets decertified. Zero votes in a heavy Demonrat district is the right penalty for this sort of thing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3489238/posts?page=43#43
It is hereby ordered that, effective immediately and extending until 11:59 p.m., November 8, 2016, or until voting in the 2016 Presidential Election is complete, Defendants Trump, Stone, and Stop the Steal—as well as their officers, agents, servants, and employees— and other individuals or groups, including groups associated with the Clinton for Presidency campaign, are restrained and enjoined from engaging in voter intimidation activity, including but not limited to:
a. Hindering or delaying a voter or prospective voter from reaching or leaving the polling place fixed for casting the voter’s ballot;
b. Engaging in any unauthorized “poll watching” activities inside of polling places, within one hundred feet of polling places (“the buffer zone”)11, or within ten feet of a voter standing in a line extending beyond the buffer zone.12 Unauthorized “poll watching” includes challenging or questioning voters or prospective voters about their eligibility to vote, or training, organizing, or directing others to do the same;
c. Interrogating, admonishing, interfering with, or verbally harassing voters or prospective voters inside polling places, in the buffer zone, or within ten feet of a voter standing in line outside the buffer zone, or training, organizing, or directing others to do the same;
d. Distributing literature and/or stating to individuals at polling places, in the buffer zone, or within ten feet of a voter standing in line outside the buffer zone, that voter fraud is a crime, or describing the penalties under any Ohio or Federal statute for impermissibly casting a ballot, or training, organizing, or directing individuals to do the same;
e. Gathering or loitering, or otherwise being present without the intention to vote, at polling places, in the buffer zone, or within ten feet of a voter standing in line outside the buffer zone;
f. Following, taking photos of, or otherwise recording voters or prospective voters, those assisting voters or prospective voters, or their vehicles at or around a polling place, or training, organizing, or directing others to do the same;
g. Questioning, and training, organizing, or deputizing any persons to question voters at Ohio polling places, in the buffer zone, or within ten feet of a voter standing in line outside the buffer zone, under the guise of the purported “exit polling” or “citizen journalist” operations organized and encouraged by Defendants Stone and Stop the Steal.
This Order does not apply to any activity explicitly authorized by Ohio law with respect to poll observers officially credentialed by a board of elections to be present at the polling place or the right under Ohio law for others to enter a polling place solely for purposes of reviewing the list of voters.13
It is further ordered that this Order be publicized to law enforcement and elections officials in advance of Election Day.
The Plaintiff will be required to post a $1,000 bond.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.