1 posted on
11/17/2016 9:52:35 PM PST by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
There was something wrong with this story since it was first reported. Let’s see the dash cam video.
2 posted on
11/17/2016 10:17:32 PM PST by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: Olog-hai
There have been cases that had video that resulted in either an acquittal or a hung jury, so sometimes the video may raise more questions, said Philip Stinson, a criminologist at Bowling Green State University who tracks fatal police shootings. Its very hard to convict in these cases. Same can be said of eyewitnesses. Is this numnuts saying additional objective evidence is bad?
WTH do they get these 'experts'?
3 posted on
11/17/2016 10:45:00 PM PST by
Ken H
(Best election ever!)
To: Olog-hai
The cop won’t be convicted. Cops aren’t convicted, ever. The evidence doesn’t matter, people are wasting their time with that. Just wait and see.
4 posted on
11/17/2016 10:57:06 PM PST by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Olog-hai
Finally an unbiased report on a police involved shooting.
Do I really need to put a sarc on it?
5 posted on
11/18/2016 4:19:22 AM PST by
fella
("As this was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Olog-hai
But it IS evidence. Right?
6 posted on
11/18/2016 4:28:40 AM PST by
themidnightskulker
(And then the thread dies... peacefully, in it's sleep....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson