Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DANGER: OBAMA COULD PUT MERRICK GARLAND ON SUPREME COURT
AMERICAN THINKER ^ | 11/22/16 | ED STRAKER

Posted on 11/22/2016 3:39:53 AM PST by chiller

.... if Congress adjourned for the year too soon, it could open a window to give President Obama a Supreme Court pick. That's because of a provision of the Constitution that allows the president to make recess appointments that can last two or more years. Now we get word that Congress is planning to adjourn early, which will give Obama an opportunity to appoint Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court.

This discussion is fairly complex, involving both constitutional and statutory law, so bear with me.

1) Why does Congress want to adjourn early? Members of Congress want to adjourn early this year so they can kill last-minute Obama regulations. ... According to a 1996 law, Congress has 60 legislative days in which to disapprove of presidential regulations.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: garland; obama; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: chiller

No, he can’t.


21 posted on 11/22/2016 4:25:55 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

It’s not a nomination...it’s an appointment until the end of the next session. It could become a nomination at that time, very likely, imho.


22 posted on 11/22/2016 4:27:07 AM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chiller

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/supreme-court-recess-appointments-108347

SCOTUS strikes appointments

In a rebuke to President Barack Obama, the Supreme Court struck down three of his recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board as unconstitutional.

The decision Thursday gives the Senate broad power to thwart future recess appointments, but did not go as far as some conservatives hoped to undercut the president’s ability to fill vacant executive branch posts and judicial slots.

The court ruled 9-0 that Obama’s appointments were unconstitutional because the Senate was not truly in recess when he made them during a three-day break in pro forma meetings of the legislative body.


23 posted on 11/22/2016 4:27:15 AM PST by Emergencyawesome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

His whole presidency has been a cheap political stunt and it hasn’t hurt his popularity.


24 posted on 11/22/2016 4:28:42 AM PST by FrdmLvr ("A is A. A thing is what it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chiller

They can not adjorn but instead leave a few to open the daily sessions.


25 posted on 11/22/2016 4:28:49 AM PST by stockpirate (OBAMA MUST BE ON THE PAYROLL OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
He can, which is why warning flags are up.
26 posted on 11/22/2016 4:29:00 AM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

check the article...there is a reason and benefit to early recess.


27 posted on 11/22/2016 4:30:03 AM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chiller

This is how you stay in session

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/19/senate.reid/

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Senators have left town for the Thanksgiving holiday, but the Senate will technically stay in session — a move that keeps President Bush from making appointments while lawmakers are in recess.

The Senate will hold “pro forma sessions” while lawmakers are gone for the Thanksgiving holiday.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, said he would schedule “pro forma” sessions during the two-week break, even though lawmakers will be absent and no business will be conducted.

The sessions are expected to last less than 30 seconds — the clerk will announce who the presiding officer is, and then that senator will gavel the session closed.

The Constitution gives a president the power to fill vacancies without the Senate’s confirmation when the legislative body is in recess. Such appointees can serve without confirmation through the rest of the current session of Congress, which ends in January 2009.

Bush has used the power before to install nominees whose confirmation Senate Democrats had blocked. The most notable instance came in August 2005 when he angered Democrats by naming John Bolton as U.N. ambassador.


28 posted on 11/22/2016 4:30:28 AM PST by Emergencyawesome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CapitalistCrusader

Who’s younger, Alina or the wise Latina?


29 posted on 11/22/2016 4:31:25 AM PST by FrdmLvr ("A is A. A thing is what it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

Hahaha! EAT YO PEAS!


30 posted on 11/22/2016 4:32:39 AM PST by FrdmLvr ("A is A. A thing is what it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Emergencyawesome
Old news and not pertinent. THIS IS A DIFFERENT SITUATION. PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE.
31 posted on 11/22/2016 4:32:51 AM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: chiller
But the session hasn't started yet, so the upcoming session is the next session. Each Congress is split into two one-year sessions. If the recess appointment were made while the session was in progress, then the end of the next session would be the one that follows the session in progress. That would not be the case when the session hasn't started yet.

-PJ

32 posted on 11/22/2016 4:33:23 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Dobutful that it would happen. Would Øbama want to end his pResidency with such a cheap political stunt?

Obama wouldn't view it as a cheap political stunt. The Narcissist in Chief would view it as "saving the country" for a few years from Donald Trump until the DemoKKKrats could regain control of Congress in the 2018 mid-term elections.

Just thinking out loud here ....

33 posted on 11/22/2016 4:34:34 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Emergencyawesome
ALSO Old news and not pertinent. THIS IS A DIFFERENT SITUATION. PLEASE READ THE ARTICLE.

They may not want to stay in session.

34 posted on 11/22/2016 4:35:57 AM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: chiller

No he can’t.


35 posted on 11/22/2016 4:37:15 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Emergencyawesome
I don't think that applies when Congress adjourns sine die. The Congress actually ends entirely, so there is nobody to keep it going. This is the recess between two different Congresses, so there is no Congress for the few weeks we are talking about.

-PJ

36 posted on 11/22/2016 4:37:28 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

That is the danger. A liberal court would face some pending crucial decisions that couldn’t be undone until justices begin dying.


37 posted on 11/22/2016 4:38:41 AM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: chiller

With this kind of stuff, I’m usually one of the dull knives in the drawer. Why does Congress have to over rule regulations. If one president can make regulations by himself, why can’t the next pres undo them?


38 posted on 11/22/2016 4:39:24 AM PST by Hiro Protaginast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

If they adjourn early it will be a signal that their cooperation with Trump is bogus


39 posted on 11/22/2016 4:42:00 AM PST by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

i’ve shown how and why he can and could. Tell me why he can not.


40 posted on 11/22/2016 4:42:16 AM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson