Posted on 11/22/2016 4:22:17 PM PST by markomalley
You thought just because Hillary Clinton lost that the email releases would stop?
Wrong.
Judicial Watch recently received 508 pages of documents, including emails, that the conservative group says shows possible conflicts of interest between Hillary Clinton’s State Department and her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
Expect periodic releases of records to continue through 2018, even though many Clinton critics have moved on following Donald Trump’s victory.
Judicial Watch – as well as other groups, including Citizens United – and news organizations had filed numerous lawsuits seeking the emails of Clinton and her top aides while she was the nation’s top diplomat after their public records requests went unanswered.
The just released Judicial Watch documents stem from a 2013 lawsuit against the State Department.
“It is a scandal that the Obama administration stalled the release of these smoking gun documents for over five years,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “These documents show that Hillary and Bill Clinton’s machine sought to shake down almost every country in the world, from Saudi Arabia to desperately poor Haiti.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...
Why did WikiLeaks quit?
If we do not root out their lawlessness we cannot remove the cancer, and folks i know are tired of gangstamint for the people but not for the gangstas..no justice if their is no law and that means we are slaves..
Then dear William, you need to read some serious history. As I suggested, start with the Quebec Campaign (try Kenneth Roberts’ March to Quebec which compiles personal journals from the Campaign) and then a few histories of the tide turning Battle of Saratoga.
I am not playing down the significance of the betrayal of the Hudson River Forts by Arnold, merely objecting to his comparison with the likes of the Clintons.
Had Arnold been captured, the penalty would have been hanging. While we might agree that Hillary deserves hanging, I doubt she deserves being hanged twice.
Another perspective is to recognize that Hillary has been embroiled in scandal for decades and thus no one should have been surprised at her most recent transgressions.
The betrayal of Washington and our infant nation by Arnold is made all the more outrageous by the relatively high regard afforded to Arnold due to his many battlefield heroics. His perfidy is that of the protagonist of a Greek tragedy. Whereas Hillary's treason is of a simpler, more common corruption, made up of equal parts of greed, ambition, and a lust for undeserved adulation.
(It's been years since I have read any "serious history" concerning Arnold but I have a vague recollection of his having come under suspicion of having used his position to enrich himself.)
The fact that Trump isn’t specifically going after the Clintons doesn’t mean he will stand in the way of his agencies prosecuting them due to so much new evidence being put out there.....
They released over 50,000 before the election as promised. Maybe that’s all they had.
Yeah, that’s my hope, too.
The investigation should go forward, and a decision can be made if the information is as damning as we all believe it is.
She’s still stonewalling on info that was requested during the campaign - she knows there is still plenty out there that can come back and bite her even if Trump doesn’t personally come after her.
Her lawyers have their standing instructions.
That’s punky.
They constantly alarmed that “This trove will put Hillary in jail”...
Arnold married into the Shippen Merchant family who were Tories and did indeed trade with the British. Arnold felt that he had made enormous sacrifices, physical and financial, but fell victim to the radical segment of Congress.
I am not disputing his treachery, simply that he had some redeeming personal qualities - Hillary Clinton, not so much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.