[Engedi]

Heard on the news this morning, as of 3am, she had raised 2M and has enough now to cover cost of Wisconsin.

I will not rest easy with Trump elect until Inauguration; Dems will not lose quietly.

[DarthVader]

Money does not matter in this case. You have to be in a position to win the election which she is not. Move on from this nonsense.

[Major Matt Mason]

Yep, I think our side gets too comfortable after the results are in (when we win, at least). The Left is 24x7 politics - they never stop, and the recount is how they steal elections. HRC may decline to do this, but she probably has Podesta, Obama, and Jarrett in her ear telling her to do it.

[MarMema]

Heard on the news this morning, as of 3am, she had raised 2M

Well of course she did. The Clintons have money for things like this.

[mtrott]

“Heard on the news this morning, as of 3am, she had raised 2M and has enough now to cover cost of Wisconsin.

I will not rest easy with Trump elect until Inauguration; Dems will not lose quietly.”

Lol, Trump’s lead in WI is 27,257 votes. Surely they don’t actually believe the count is off by that much.

[Alberta's Child]

The election results will not change unless somehow Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania ALL turn from Trump to Clinton.

I suspect this is why Clinton conceded in 2016 even earlier than Kerry did in 2004. This wasn't just one close state that decided the election -- it was three of them.

This tells me that any of these stupid "recount" moves are just posturing. If anyone really thought the results of this election could turn, they'd be filing for recounts in other close states just in case one of the three that have gotten all the attention (MI, PA and WI) doesn't turn out the way they want.