Consider the source - "Time" is a globalist publication with an agenda. The study, itself, is accurate.
Why should any population increase when they know the government is lying about unemployment, and there is a dirth of jobs ?
Manufacturing is dying in the USA, and encouraged by the FED, we have become a service society, and that does not create income, it merely spreads it around.
There is no motivation to increase numbers or perogeny; parenting is considered a liability, rather than an asset, except in some minority populations.
We are funding failed schools in the public sector, which are actually indoctrination centers for progressive/liberalism/socialism .
Where is the incentive ?
Loss of family income, dysfunctional school systems, lack of opportunity, loss of manufacturing jobs,etc.- now you tell me what is the upside (?)
and why should I have more kids that I can ill afford on my limited income, with increased taxes, and has more liabilities than a productive future ?
Indeed, I assumed so and did not question this. My response was about interpretation.
One characteristic of intergroup conflict is that one group often considers another to be BOTH inferior AND in control of everything. In my opinion, your long list belongs in that category.
If "white people" genuinely believe that their most significant choices in life are entirely controlled by others, and they choose extinction, then that says something.