Posted on 12/02/2016 1:34:59 AM PST by nikos1121
I would think the heads up for Trump is unnecessary, but we've been duped before.
I guess we'll see on day one, as the sancturary cities are lining up against the will of the people.
I guess we'll see.
And it looks like I'll have to keep watching for BOTH of our sakes, since you've given a free pass in advance to every one of his future appointees and his future actions for the next 8 years, and you've decided that your eyes will be full of sand or something smellier, depending on where you've placed your head. So yeah, I'll have to do the watching for both of us.
Please explain where she's wrong.
Please explain where the signs, that he is back-peddling on immigration, are....last I heard, it was first things first - start securing the border and getting rid of the more criminal elements - then on in logical phases.
All the "what ifs" are doing is digging deep for some reason to ignore the bullet we dodged and compromise his image among our side.
First, a little logic, since you seem so devoid. I'm not the one sitting here claiming that my "observing" him is going to make an ounce of difference. Neither am I giving him orders. With me so far, douche-tool?
Second, how many times has Trump called you? Have you spoken on the phone or in person with Donald since the Convention? I have.
So go suck rocks, moron.
I trust his judgement, I will wait to see his actions once he’s president. I think he will look at everything through a lens of “will this benefit America/Americans?” and the actions he takes will be good almost all of the time.
He may do some things we disagree on sometimes but as long as he stays on the America first track 80% of the time, I will be delighted beyond my wildest dreams.
Imagine a president using the word Christmas and celebrating Easter with his family instead of releasing slobbering lovefest messages for muslim holidays and spending every Sunday playing golf smoking dope.
As far as I know, first things first is still the name of the game too. I see no problems with everything Trump's done so far.
And as far as "compromising his image," I see nothing of that in her piece either. Did you read all of it? Again, please show how you think she does that. Thanks in advance.
First, some basic lessons in logic: Straw Dog arguments are a coward's way of arguing, and show you up for the turd that you are.
I'm not the one sitting here claiming that my "observing" him is going to make an ounce of difference. Neither am I giving him orders.
And what do we have here? Yes indeedy. Yet another Straw Dog, since I never claimed that my "observing" him would make a difference. I said that true conservatives with large followings, such as Coulter & Hannity, and all of us millions in the trenches, should together be eternally vigilant with ALL politicians. Especially with Republican politicians, since we - more than anyone else - put them into power, and I do believe most of them are smart enough to listen to our collective voices. So go twist that into yet another Straw Dog, as your hyperventilating delusions convince you that I fancy that I can and should "give orders to Trump". Logic? Schmogic. I'm surprised you can even spell the word.
With me so far, douche-tool?
Nope, I have no plans to stick my head where yours is, because as I suspected, it's down in the nether regions, where you seem to be finding all kinds of interesting objects. Was the douche-tool you just found perhaps left there by one of your "partners"?
Second, how many times has Trump called you? Have you spoken on the phone or in person with Donald since the Convention? I have.
Actually, I've gotten to shake hands with most GOP Prez & VP candidates for some years now. It comes from volunteering hundreds of hours of time over decades to help Republican candidates at all levels. After shaking Sarah Palin's hand and saying a few words to her the day after McCain picked her, I didn't want to wash it again. (Shaking McCains's hand was, in comparison, an afterthought).
So go suck rocks, moron.
Hold on .... I think I know where I've seen you now! Yes, yes ... the constant "LMAO!!" against Ann Coulter gives you away. Bill Maher, is this really you? But why pick "Gargantua"? Because of your enormous ego, Bill?
Well, if you're not Maher, I certainly can't tell you apart. He "LMAO!!"s at what Coulter says about Donald Trump, and so do you. Two peas in a pod. Look at this one here, from a year and a half ago, when Ann says that Donald is going to win, only to get raucously laughed at --- June 19th, 2015 - Ann Coulter predicts Donald Trump will be the GOP Nominee
She also predicted he'd have a much easier time beating Hillary than Bernie. More LMAO!s at that one. And she predicted all this a full 18 months ago. Sounds to me like she's got more political smarts in her toenail than you have in that entire upper extremity appendage that's stuck where the sun don't shine. So it doesn't surprise me that a pundit with her track record on Trump-related prognostications, who is brave enough to stick up for her beliefs in a roomful of jerks - Maher & guests & audience - all booing & jeering her, happen to be on the exact same page as you; you and your raucous laughter at her latest prediction regarding Trump, namely, on what would happen if Trump should somehow be talked into "softening his stance" on immigration.
You do not know Trump.
You have never met Trump.
So you assume that I haven't either. You assume that my belief in him is blind "head up my ass" faith. You've said so several times now.
My faith in him stems from a close 40-year relationship.
See what happens when you substitute "know" with "assume?" Probably not. S'okay.
Hint:
It wasn't you.
Well done Ann Coulter. I like your Bulldog-like tenacious ferocity in sticking with the immigration issue. (Actually Bulldogs are just big playful puppies for life but it sounded good)
In my humble opinion all of America’s problems can be linked back to immigration. Mostly illegal immigration but also somewhat with legal immigration when workers from other countries are allowed in to take jobs an American can do but the foreign worker will do cheaper such as what happened at Disney World in Florida where the American workers were used to train their foreign replacements. Not good and should never ever happen again. All those workers replaced should get a settlement check large enough to allow them to retire for life even if they are still in their 30’s just to send a message to Disney and any other corporation who plans of putting their bottom line ahead of the country. Yes, the country, because without a productive and happy American workforce we have nothing. Nothing wrong with healthy competition in the workplace but it shouldn’t be with non American workers who should be looking for work in their own country unless they have skills no Americans have and if that’s the case they should be used to train Americans.
The days of America being a wide open frontier for all immigrants to come and carve out a plot of land for themselves have been done for over 100 years. Open borders and immigration are the biggest threat to America today.
But since you predicted a "Trump LANDSLIDE," then you've got some crow to eat.
I had to argue with many, many of my closest GOP friends who looked at the post-convention national polls up until election day and despaired, that the polls were wrong and that Trump would win - based on my past observations of which kinds of elections defy all the pollster predictions.
But since at least since last June, I've also been arguing with fellow Freepers who were believing in a 50 state LANDSLIDE for Trump, ie even greater than Reagan's or Nixon's 49-1 margins. And no, I've not rubbed it in to them, and don't plan to.
But since you're one of those who react to even the mildest disagreement with you as an excuse to go ballistic on the Trash Talking, I certainly will be interested to see your reaction to the first major mistake of Trump's, whether it comes in 5 hours or 5 weeks or 5 years.
So as soon as Trump does these two things:
o Moves decisively on immigration.
o Moves decisively on the current USSC opening, and then on future openings,
.... then I can at last breathe easy! And at that point, I can actually stop paying close attention to national politics. Because after those two gaping, bleeding wounds in Uncle Sam are staunched and stitched by Surgeon in Chief Donald Trump, everything else on my list of "I wish our Prez would change this" is so far below those two that I have faith the rest will take care of themselves. If he takes care of those two in a solid, hard-to-undo-by-a-successor kind of way, then heck - I can spot him an infinite number of mulligans on how he implements the undoing of ZeroCare, on foreign policy, on ridding us of Education-By-Teachers-Unions, you name it.
By the way, nice Liberal diversionary subject-change from getting your ass handed to you! Pelosi would be proud!
That is what is known as a "win" - which is what I predicted, and is in no way, shape or form the "LANDSLIDE!" you predicted, my neurosynaptically-challenged friend.
I'll try to use small words:
1972: NIXON: 61%-37% of Popular Votes, 49 States, 97% of Electoral Vote == "LANDSLIDE" 1984: REAGAN: 59%-41% of Popular Votes, 49 States, 98% of Electoral Vote == "LANDSLIDE" 2016: TRUMP: 46%-48% of Popular Votes, 31 States, 57% of Electoral Vote == "WIN"
If that's still too complex, I could maybe post some pie charts with pretty colors. Would those work better? Do you prefer pastels or neons?
Caw, caw caw!!!
Aha, good to see you've started to eat your crow. But by the background noise, it sounds like it's still alive. Normally I would strongly advise you to first cook it thoroughly before eating, but I suss you're not the kind to take ANYone's advice.
... blah blah blah blah your ass handed to you!
Nope. It's clearly still your ass with your head in it. Good to see some things never change. At least you're consistent.
Their unprecedented efforts to install Hillary fell short, but they still wield significant power over low information voters...
With the less-close elections, it's not as clear-cut. But still I have strong suspicions Clintoon would have lost in 1992 with a balanced MSM, and Zero would have lost at least one of his elections. We'll never know for sure.
“Vote for Pedro”
Truth be told, while I enjoy an energetic téte-â-téte, my honest feelings are that if you're finally backing Trump, you're "Okay!" in my book.
Forgive me if I pursue other challenging discussions heretofore. I bid you and yours a very Merry Christmas.
I think I just puked in my mouth. <<<
How does it taste?
You’ve never been in the Military....have you.....*S*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.