Dr. Jillary Clintonstein’s attempt to reanimate HRC’s corpse in federal court will be interesting.
1) Stein has zero chance of a recount elevating her even to 3rd place, much less winning, so she has suffered no damage, and the remedy she seeks will not benefit her. She therefore has no standing.
2) She is obviously acting as a proxy for Clinton, which means all her court filings are in bad faith. Sanctions for frivolous filings?
3) PA state court provided a legal venue for pursuing a recount, but Stein withdrew her suit rather than pay a reasonable fee for the cost of her vanity recount.
4) Her excuse for not paying was lack of funds, yet she boasts of having raised $7 million.
5) She paid Wisconsin $3.5 million to pursue her farcical recount there, demonstrating agreement in principle that a 4th place candidate should pay the cost of a vanity recount.
6) Unless her recount funds have been embezzled, most of the remaining $3.5 million should be available. Claims that it has all been spent on lawyers are absurd. Provide an accounting for every cent. She is lying about her reasons for changing to federal court.
7) If she’s blown $3.5 on legal fees for zero results so far, what is her budget for the federal suit? Maybe she could have chosen to pay the $1 million to PA instead of spending $2 million on lawyers for the federal suit?
8) Stein has no evidence of fraud in the vote counting stage. A hand recount would change a pittance of votes “miscounted” because of the voters wrote in “You go girl” instead of her name. (She’s not investigating registration and identity fraud which is the Democrat fraud really occurs).
Good luck with that federal suit.
Very good analysis.