All your rambling simply sounded like your were saying his actions were justified.
In his mind and those of numerable Muslims.
Not in mine though.
But I’m no Muslim. Never will be nor will I ever pay their damnable tax.
As for what that “rambling” was about: I was trying to show how Islam itself is the problem. It isn’t “Islam and Sharia Law” because they are one and the same. Islam provides justification for terrorism AND terrorists say they wage Jihad to advance Sharia Law. Those are facts no matter how anyone else feels about them.
If anyone wants to argue some specific abuse, that the terrorists are wrong about Sharia Law and all that, that still does not change the fact that the terrorists are doing what they are doing for their stated reasons.
Such arguments may be useful to dissuade Muslims from joining militant ranks and they may even separate some jihadis from the herd but that is all.
Let me ask you something: if you think about the relationship between Islam / Sharia in general and militant Islam in particular do you imagine that the latter is like some boil or wart on the former that might be cut off (since it’s understanding of Islam is spurious) OR do you see the latter as a core of the former (as if they had a sound legal position under Sharia Law)?