So, everybody has been saying the Green party is embarrassed by Jill’s actions.
Apparently not.
If anyone had a good impression of the Greens, this news ends it.
I never gave the Greens a thought, but now I hate these wankers.
The voters rights are the right to vote IF THEY ARE A CITIZEN and to have their vote counted. That’s been done.
Mullah Obama or Nana Hillary could at least try to stop this, if they cared about a “peaceful transition.”
This ongoing saga is useful only in the revelation that the Greens are just one more undercover shill for the global elite.
” Pennsylvania’s barriers to a recount violate voters’ constitutional rights.”
Then that means that all the states won by Hillary now have to be recounted. By the way, why is not Stein’s heart bleeding for voters in the states Trump lost?
And after that recount, then another recount is required.
Elections as a way to choose leaders are no longer valid. They all violate voters’ constitutional rights, since someone will lose and not like it.
Waaahhhh!!! Make them do what I want!!!
Zzzzzz.
Did this case go to another handpicked democrat judge?
Bill Pryor is a federal judge. Let him weigh in on it!
Have they found an Obama appointed judge yet?
Someone posted yesterday this was gonna happen.
Anybody know anything about the Judge they “selected”?
Hillary promised the Green Party a part in her Dictatorship ?
At least in Michigan’s case, she filed on time to request a recount. Given that, I can to a certain extent why the federal judge at least said please let the recount take place on those grounds (because at least the bare bones of the law were followed in that instance).
In Pennsylvania, she failed to do the above, withdrew her petition on Saturday for an appearance today before state election officials there, did not have sufficient funds to post the bond, was already turned down by a judge in Montgomery County for a recount there due to lack of evidence. There really is not anything to suggest that she exhausted her options at the state level and that the state did anything improper on their part as to ignore the spirit/intent of their election recount laws, as to justify a federal court stepping in to tell them do the recount as in Michigan. Maybe wishful thinking on my part, but it seems she has even less of a case here than in the two other states.
Without the Greenies Hillary would have won. Maybe Hillary wants to do this to destroy them.
Like Michigan, they have found their judge.
This is a horrendous precedent being set for national elections.
We no longer are allowed to have states. No, we really aren’t.
How does that even get past the laugh out loud test?
The posting of a bond is set forth in the state law, with an amount to be set based on anticipated costs that might be assessed against the party asking to invalidate the election.
Stein's initial filing at the state level had far less evidence than is required by statute, including no actual evidence of an illegal election. Her lawyers pointed to attempts to hack into voting registration systems in other states as evidence, but those events have nothing to do with the actual election in Pennsylvania. Her petition included a declaration from a professor who relied on a DHS press release, but the press release itself contradicts the professor's position.
The filings in the Pennsylvania state court action are here