Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

My understanding is that anyone meeting the requirements for the presidency can run for the presidency, and that they can run as candidates from their own freshly minted political party. So, the Xzins Party can run Xzins.

Apparently, that gives me the right to demand a recount of an election. And if the interpretation that it can disenfranchise a state of its electoral votes is correct, then that means anyone with a beef can pretty much try to prevent a state from certifying its electors on time.

That is a crazy system.


9 posted on 12/05/2016 11:14:37 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

I agree.

Our involvement is in the voting booth.

Only people with a vested interest as a candidate should be able to challenge a count.

If Clinton wanted to, I wouldn’t be happy, but I could at least see a reason. Jill Stein had no vested interest in the outcome. She was statistically eliminated, beyond a doubt.

So what we were (are being) subjected to is a sham, another smoke and mirrors effort.

I’m so sick of that.


12 posted on 12/05/2016 11:22:35 AM PST by DoughtyOne (jcon40, "Are we be coming into the age of Sanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I think if the recount is not finished in time, the original results stand. There is no waiting around for states to finish recounting. There is no losing electors.


54 posted on 12/05/2016 5:50:19 PM PST by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson