Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roostercogburn

This is a double edged sword. If the 6th decides against Michigan this is the end of the trail. The SCOTUS if there is an appeal might decide but if they tie, the decision the 6th makes will stand with no more appeal.


4 posted on 12/05/2016 12:31:44 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pfflier

What is the political balance of the 6th court of appeals? Do we have a decent chance of a fair hearing with them?


9 posted on 12/05/2016 12:34:16 PM PST by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

“The SCOTUS if there is an appeal might”

I’m betting that the SC will not take up this case in any form.


10 posted on 12/05/2016 12:34:17 PM PST by MaxistheBest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

Well the count has started regardless... at this point even if 6th circuit denies, no additional harm will come other than the counting.


11 posted on 12/05/2016 12:34:29 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier
This is a double edged sword. If the 6th decides against Michigan this is the end of the trail. The SCOTUS if there is an appeal might decide but if they tie, the decision the 6th makes will stand with no more appeal.

I think that is what the left is shooting for now. Lets face it, with the Wisconsin recount half complete and Hillary actually losing votes and Pennsylvania looking to be dead in the water, they know at this point that nothing they do is going to change the election result. So they are shooting for the next best thing, starting so many legal battles that the Republicans will be forced to take it all the way to the Supreme Court, just to insure that Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania get certified before the electoral college meets. Then the left can scream, "Selected not elected!" and "They must be hiding fraud, they shut down the recount!" for the next four years.

15 posted on 12/05/2016 12:39:34 PM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

The precedent is Bush v. Gore.
Trump’s rights under the 14th. Amendment are being
violated by Jill Stein and her recounts.

Of course a ruling that quotes that case is just
the bloody shirt the Left is looking to come away
with here.


18 posted on 12/05/2016 12:43:17 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

Does the federal court even have jurisdiction over state matters such as this?


29 posted on 12/05/2016 12:53:41 PM PST by meyer (There is no political solution to this troubling evolution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson