Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

In the early 1980’s if a guy stopped asking after his first “no” he would have never gotten anywhere.

I never got physical or angry, but I could be persistent.

My wife says that she was taught that a proper young lady always rebuffed the first advance.

All that being said, courting is confusing enough without getting the PC police involved.

In my world, the line between “persistent” and “rape” was physical force.

My son - who is in college now - says that they are being taught that “no means no” and that they MUST stop any kind of “persistence” at the first “no”.

Good thing that wasn’t the case when I went or he might not be here.


45 posted on 12/06/2016 8:16:35 AM PST by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Crusher138
they MUST stop any kind of “persistence” at the first “no”.

Which makes the young women really, really mad. No wonder everybody on campus these days is miserable.

Normal people understand the difference between "forcing" and "cajoling." But liberals aren't normal.

49 posted on 12/06/2016 8:26:53 AM PST by workerbee (The President of the United States is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson