Aggrieved is not part of the PA legal language, that is MI. She is basically asking the federal court to re-write PA law by requiring a forensic exam which is nowhere to be found in PA election law. This is DOA.
I’ve been hearing DOA for weeks and yet here we are. I don’t know what the point is to be honest. They haven’t been able to count the votes in a month, they aren’t going to recount them in time to seat electors. So, it’s either you accept the results or don’t seat your electors. One judge gets to decide this? B.S if you ask me
Okay, not aggrieved, not a problem, but Stein still has no standing, that is to say, skin in the game. And she hasn’t shown any cause for the court to believe that fraud was committed in places that would have helped the winner.