Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: granada

Now that they’ve given up hope on flipping the states with the recount, they’ve gone back full swing to wishfully thinking the electors will do their bidding. And what is this “only 37” this author speaks of?? 37 electors is a LOT to try to get to turn turncoat.


14 posted on 12/07/2016 11:37:02 PM PST by Obsidian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Obsidian

Yes, that’s exactly what they’re trying to do. Won’t work though.


83 posted on 12/08/2016 3:06:11 AM PST by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Obsidian

I guess the left has redefined yet another word. It is an interesting new definition of the word “only”. In the entire history of US Presidential elections, there has been a total of 177 faithless electors. Of these, 71 failed to vote for the pledged candidate because the candidate died prior to the EC vote. Another 68 involved electors who voted for theor pledged Presidential candidate but were faithless in their VP vote. That leaves a grand total of 38 electors who were truly faithless in their Presidential vote in our entire history. The Dems “only” need to get one less faithless elector in this election than there have been in the previous 55 combined!


100 posted on 12/08/2016 5:58:45 AM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson