Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pcottraux
Dark matter, IMO, is just a fudge factor to make gravitational rotations come out right. I don't think it will end up like the cosmological constant which Einstein refused to accept for a long time until he was forced to adopt it.  IOW, I think there will be a non-black matter explanation.

As for this ---
we’ll never know for sure what did it.
--- be careful with that kind of thinking.  Bear in mind the head of the US Patent Office who, near the turn of the last century, said they should close up the USPO because everything that can be invented, had been.

Or closer to the thrust of the thread, prominent scientist Auguste Comte, who wrote in 1842 that it was impossible we should ever know the composition of stars.  Less than thirty years later, the science of spectroscopy was developed.

33 posted on 12/14/2016 10:55:09 AM PST by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: sparklite2

But those involve scientific observations about the present and/or future. Science of the past is a lot more speculative. Paleontology and archaeology run into the same problem; unless a dinosaur steps out of a time machine and says “No guys, this is how we went extinct,” we will never know for sure and much of it is simply guesswork. I’ve heard dozens of theories about the extinction, and new ones are always popping up. Even if we definitively solve it, some joker scientist will come along with a new theory with new evidence that casts doubt on the official explanation. Here we go again!


41 posted on 12/14/2016 11:08:56 AM PST by pcottraux ( depthsofpentecost.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson