Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails
Dailymail.com ^ | 15:33 EST, 14 December 2016 | Alana Goodman

Posted on 12/14/2016 4:12:47 PM PST by muffaletaman

A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whisteblowers - and not hacked by Russia. Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016electionhack; 2016trumprussiahack; election; russia; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Assange said long ago that Russia was not the source. This is being ignored by the MSM.
1 posted on 12/14/2016 4:12:47 PM PST by muffaletaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

This needs coverage somewhere in the US, somehow!

Does anyone have any ideas or contacts in the US media?

How can this be covered in the UK and ignored here? It’s a miracle...

I guess this is just a coincidental confirmation of the bias and “in-the-tank-ism” exhibited by the media, as has been referenced by the PEOTUS.


2 posted on 12/14/2016 4:19:43 PM PST by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

RIP Seth Rich


3 posted on 12/14/2016 4:19:57 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

What about this one?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3504711/posts?page=35#35


4 posted on 12/14/2016 4:22:29 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

Where is your “Person Of Interest” class surveillance when something like this happens?

Oh - right - if this WAS such an operation, then it would have to have been inadequately covered.

Some conspiracies are theories, some are actual conspiracies.

Some fake news is really the real news.


5 posted on 12/14/2016 4:25:38 PM PST by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman
Aren't these Podesta leaks?

Where are the H->! e-mails?

6 posted on 12/14/2016 4:31:16 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

I agree with “what about this one.”

But where is the traction, the coverage?

This is a reference to a Comey’s comments threw the election article.

There are 4 freep-posts on Assange in this referenced thread.

AND Assange did say this previously.

But Assange’s statement on this have fallen into the void of the “doesn’t promote the desired narrative” black hole.


7 posted on 12/14/2016 4:31:55 PM PST by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

“The leakers’ motivation was ‘disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the ‘tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders’”

Might be BS but if true, BOOM!


8 posted on 12/14/2016 4:33:41 PM PST by McGruff (If you tell a lie and keep repeating it, stupid people will come to believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The DNC and Podesta emails were distributed by WikiLeaks, obtained via the ambassador as cited above.

ALL of Hillary’s emails - both turned over to the State Department and deleted (bit-wiped) from her server - are also available in Bluffdale, Utah.

https://nsa.gov1.info/utah-data-center/


9 posted on 12/14/2016 4:36:46 PM PST by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

While there is a consensus on Capitol Hill that Russia hacked U.S. political groups and officials, some Republicans say it’s not clear whether the motive was to try to swing the election or just to collect intelligence.

‘Now whether they intended to interfere to the degree that they were trying to elect a certain candidate, I think that’s the subject of investigation,’ said Sen. John McCain on CBS Face the Nation. ‘But facts are stubborn things, they did hack into this campaign.’


10 posted on 12/14/2016 4:37:29 PM PST by McGruff (If you tell a lie and keep repeating it, stupid people will come to believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

Then the CIA should be able to call in some favors and give the H->! mails to the Electors....


11 posted on 12/14/2016 4:38:10 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Juan IS a hack.


12 posted on 12/14/2016 4:38:50 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

This should end for good this chaotic mining operation for Russian hackers. It is time to put a FAILED stamp on the entire enterprise.


13 posted on 12/14/2016 4:39:12 PM PST by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

So far, all Clinton “BOOMS” have been muffled to the point of being inaudible and thus having no effect.

Maybe Sessions as Attorney General will change this.


14 posted on 12/14/2016 4:39:38 PM PST by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2; muffaletaman

Give the H-> emails to the illary electors?

Or to all of em?


15 posted on 12/14/2016 4:41:58 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

BUT here is the deal - it WAS NOT THE RUSSIANS that were the source of the emails distributed by WikiLeaks.

The emails were leaked from one (or more?) DNC insiders, directly to WikiLeaks.

No Russians or Russian operatives once- twice- thrice- or whatever removed.

It Was NOT the Russians.


16 posted on 12/14/2016 4:43:42 PM PST by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

Seth Rich died because of this incident. I hope the truth comes out and that his family up in Omaha Nebraska gets some peace from knowing what happened to him. He was murdered to protect John Podesta and Hillary Clinton


17 posted on 12/14/2016 4:43:47 PM PST by ncfool ( We are in the United Socialist State of aMeriKa. The USSA. Sheeple of aMeriKa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman

Probably true but who knows?
Anyone can say anything.

To wit: How many people actually read the leaked/hacked Podesta emails? I mean, there where tens of thousands of them, if not more. No one person could have read all those emails before the election. It took TEAMS of journalists to comb over them night and day.

99.9% of voters did not read those emails. So I can’t see any way they could have swayed the election one way or the other.

Media characterizations of them may have swayed a few people not to vote for Clinton ... to either vote 3rd party or not vote at all. But I can’t see how these reports could have swayed a Clinton voter to vote for Trump.

There is NO WAY to prove that the election was swayed by the release of the Podesta emails. I personally do not know one other person who even tried to read the emails. I read about 200 or so of them at random over several weeks. They did not sway my vote at all.

The Project Veritas videos probably swayed more votes or swayed some people who were planning to vote for Clinton to not vote at all. But even that I don’t think had a significant enough effect to sway the entire election.


18 posted on 12/14/2016 4:44:15 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

It might have been Seth Rich?

It might have been some other DNC personage?

Hmm... it MIGHT even have been the NSA itself?

But it wasn’t the Russians.


19 posted on 12/14/2016 4:48:08 PM PST by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman
I love the fact that there still are some honest people in our government...hence the hand off of emails...

I think with the Anthony Weiner computer, wiki leaks, John Podesta files, and Clinton Emails, we could have the biggest crime on the face of the earth, involving a lot of elected officials from both parties, from foreign countries and past presidents...

Can you just imagine what has been going on for years??? Do we have enough prisons for all of them???

20 posted on 12/14/2016 4:48:13 PM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson