Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter
...but no one has made an official/published case to the effect that Stanley Ann didn’t turn up in Seattle and take classes at UoW. Rather, it’s acknowledged that she did.

History is replete with examples of people who didn't run with the herd, who diligently worked for years on their thesis, many of whom were burned at the stake for their revelations. You do our research no harm by your accusations, rather, you illustrate that you are unable to think for yourself or see what is there, right in front of your nose. You mention Corsi. He's a good example. He's questioned that baby-sitter a number of times. He knows she's lying. And it's really that simple. If she, as she stated twice, babysat a child in January 1961, that child wasn't zero, and his mother was the Anna Obama shown in the directory. Because in January, 1961, if Stanley Ann was the mother of any child, she would have had to conceive while she was still in high school.

320 posted on 12/18/2016 1:33:27 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

‘You mention Corsi.’

No, I didn’t. I mentioned Cashill.

Can you answer a simple question? Why would two Leftist/Progressive universities collude to commit academic fraud, if the upshot is to delegitimize the Left’s favorite president, Obama? If they had resolved to risk their reputations with brazen lies, why not do it in such a way as to help Obama, rather than by cutting his credibility off at the knees?

[I.e.: if Stanley Ann was not taking classes at UoW in ‘61, why break the law in order to say she was? All that accomplished was to invalidate Dreams. Why would UoW collude with UoH to illegally and fundamentally discredit Obama’s memoir?]


326 posted on 12/18/2016 7:47:45 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks

‘You mention Corsi.’

No, I didn’t. I mentioned Cashill.

Can you answer a simple question? Why would two Leftist/Progressive universities collude to commit academic fraud, if the upshot is to delegitimize the Left’s favorite president, Obama? If they had resolved to risk their reputations with brazen lies, why not do it in such a way as to help Obama, rather than by cutting his credibility off at the knees?

[I.e.: if Stanley Ann was not taking classes at UoW in ‘61, why break the law in order to say she was? All that accomplished was to invalidate Dreams. Why would UoW collude with UoH to illegally and fundamentally discredit Obama’s memoir?]


327 posted on 12/18/2016 7:47:46 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson