Thanks for all the details. I remember reading a lot or all of this a few years ago, and it’s good to have it presented again.
Just like the fake birth certificate was designed to show zero was born in Hawaii, the fabricated transcript was designed to confirm that the woman Mary babysat for was Stanley Ann Dunham, not Anna Obama.
They failed on both counts.
The woman Mary babysat for was Anna Obama, and just as Mary said, it was when her own daughter, who was born in July 1959, was 18 months of age.
Anna, as the Kenyan student called her, approached the Salvation Army about an adoption in April 1961. If that approach had been made by Stanley Ann Dunham, the event itself on one INS document, and the mother’s name in another, would not have needed to be deleted or truncated.
Anna wasn’t meant to be found. Charlette really upset the apple-cart, she understood that later, when several months after her story appeared on her The Museum of the Mysteries website, she edited the mistake she had made by repeating Mary’s statement.
Anna may have been trying to carry on with her studies like she promised her parents, as she told Mary, she certainly seems to have believed she would go to Kenya with the father of her child...where, by tribal custom, he would have to also marry a tribal wife.
Which, once you understand the blending of the two women, is the story Stanley Ann Dunham told Susan Blake when she showed her little zero, and told Susan she was married to a Kenyan native and madly in love and going to Boston.
Years later, Susan, after admitting she never saw Stanley Ann Dunham again, suggests she was going to Boston to meet up with her husband at Harvard. Susan didn’t realise the kenyan wouldn’t be there for another year.
And that is as much as is possible to follow, without the name of the mother on the INS docs, or a genuine sworn copy of the university enrolments...