Why did Dreams, in ‘95, and Obama, in 2004, claim his parents had lived for two years in HI as man and wife?
Why did two different universities go to such trouble—and commit criminal acts—to discredit both Dreams and Obama’s 2004 keynote speech?
Why have both Cashill and Corsi—who are intimately familiar with universities and transcripts—along with a slew of other published writers, never notice the (supposed)fraudulent nature of both the UoW and UoH transcripts? Both have publicly accepted the transcripts validity implicitly.
[No more Gallileo, please. Thousands have picked up on the fraudulent issues re Obama’s BC. Meanwhile, the only people in the world questioning the transcripts are posting on these obscure threads. If you claim someone else, such as Corsi, agrees with you, then show evidence. Anybody can say anything, but the claim is only as good as the evidence.]
How can you be certain that Toutonghi, a full-on liberal and Obamaphile, is both accurate enough and honest enough to serve as the foundation of the Anna-is-not-Ann theory?
If this scam was conceived decades ago, why is it so full of holes?