Fred Nerks wrote:
“Of course he has a citizenship problem, there’s nothing valid that shows who his parents were nor where he came from.
You can’t have it more simple.”
If there isn’t anything valid, where is the ‘two Ann’ and ‘two babies’ theory going; what is its purpose?
It’s not a “theory”. It’s where the evidence led.
That is a very good question. Here’s another: why would UoW and UoH join forces to destroy the Obama-fairytale, first told in Dreams, and then retold by Obama himself upon his 2004 intro to the national stage? If UoH was willing to participate in a crime, then why not a crime to help rather than hurt Obama?
We’re told that the real harm would have been to reveal the existence of Anna. Then why in heaven’s name LIE to the effect that SA was in Seattle??? We’re told the evanescent/mythical Anna was there. Then why call attention to that location at all??? Why wouldn’t UoW just stay out of it, and let UoH pretend SA was there the entire time???
Please, nobody suggest that SA’s transcripts were forged to cover for Anna’s transcripts. No transcripts for Anna exist. If they ever did (they didn’t), why not just delete them? Why go through the criminal act of forging fake transcripts for SA?
I know that to the non-logical minds that believe all this, it somehow makes sense. And that is downright scary.
[Best possible Anna-is-not-a-variant-of-Ann solution. Rather than commit criminal acts and academic fraud, why would they not simply have had someone from the U confirm that Ann was going by Anna at the time. If there really was a vast leftwing conspiracy afoot, this, or similar solutions, would have been a 100x preferable to the illegal, clumsy, convoluted, Obama-credibilty-devasting ‘solution,’ we’re asked to believe they cooked up.]