My thoughts are that if someone has a desired outcome, whatever info is out there will get filtered so actual evidence or information that doesn’t fit the desired outcome will be ignored or otherwise filtered out.
The only way to find truth is to see what is there - where leads go - and have no pre-determined outcome. Truth will gradually emerge, kind of like when putting together a 1000 piece puzzle and the box with the picture on it is gone.
Zullo mentioned something like this in the news conference. Not the puzzle analogy, but their methodology. Odd ideas and theories that hinge on only one little detail (or even an imaginary detail) and ignore all other evidence are worthless. What to speak of made up out of whole cloth stuff like Joel Gilbert’s mockumentary.
Spot on! I can say quite sincerely, that nothing we found was the result of a preconceived notion, we simply followed the trail of serendipity and that exposed a lot of interesting information - and a whole lot of lies.
I had lots of help, there were nine of to start with, who did not want to be identified, and still don’t.
I don’t blame them...
I’m the punching bag.