It’s not projection. It’s a response to your post which is littered with negative hyperbole. There is no ‘sickeningly malicious and vile gossip.’... There is civil discussion. There is pursuit of the truth. There’s no attempt to silence dissent. If you find it “repulsive and disgusting” that’s a crying shame.
There is no Anna Toot ‘theory’ since her name originated from the Kenyans. Her name conflicts with Ayer’s story and upsets your apple cart. So be it.
Equating the thread to global warming alarmists, PC speech, islamists, vilifying Cashill, or a cult is absurd. It’s a mere discussion and analysis of facts as they appear. It’s a voluntary exchange of complicated ideas and leads to decipher the truth. Once again, participation is completely voluntary.
You’ve been here how long, BGS? Nine months? Closer to ten? And you merrily prattle on, telling me what I’ve personally experienced over the past roughly seven years?
How do you do that? Are you a retread? Do you actually go back that far, just under a different name?
If this is your first iteration, then how did you aquire such extensive knowledge? It’s not every day that a relatively new sign up lectures me on what has and hasn’t happened over so a wide span of years.
Tell you what—I’ll make a deal with you. If you can identify the single most obnoxious post that was made to me on this thread, and give a complete and accurate account of what made it outstandingly vile, I will publicly acknowledge that in fact you DO know what you’re talking about.
It’s very simple, very easy and straightforward. If you succeed, you win. If not, you demonstrate dispositively that you have no earthly idea what you’re talking about.
So let’s see what you have, once and for all.