[Brad from Tennessee]

[”I met separately with FBI (Director) James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” said Brennan in the email, according to the Washington Post.]

Another anonymous source with third-hand hearsay. “Consensus” can be subjective.

[MNDude]

Good old Comey...

[UCANSEE2]

[”I met separately with FBI (Director) James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” said Brennan in the email, according to the Washington Post.]

"The consensus was that the Russians had nothing to do with it, but I decided I would just make an implication that it was the opposite."

[Chewbarkah]

Extremely subjective and meaningless by design.

“strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,...”

Based on Clapper and Comey’s public statements, that strong consensus must be that the Russian government had little or no actual interference in the US election, beyond what every country does.

Brennan’s statement has two purposes: 1) dictate a party line to “his” employees; 2) give “journalists” a blank screen for projecting their favorite conclusions.