Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firearms bill to face amendments (NM bills to outlaw private sales without background checks)
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | February 4, 2017 | Dan McKay

Posted on 02/09/2017 11:04:43 AM PST by CedarDave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: CedarDave
Certainly a factor is that NM is always at the bottom, or nearly so, for education, poverty, jobs, etc. and at the top for crime and violence statistics per capita.

Years ago I worked in South Carolina and the saying there then was "Thank God for Mississippi, otherwise we'd be No. 50." Well, Old Miss is still at 50, but NM is getting close at 43.

21 posted on 02/09/2017 5:10:45 PM PST by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Though this bill is unenforceable in many regards, one place that it likely CAN be enforced, is at a gun show, which is what the anti-gun retards want to do away with. The anti-gun idiots buy into all the propaganda about gun shows being some sort of firearms clearinghouse for people with bad intent. Yes, a private seller possibly could sell an AK to a closet Muslim who has bad plans for that rifle, but unless he’s an idiot, he’ll find that rifle one way or another despite whatever laws are on the books.

This legislation is nothing more than one more little bit of our 2A freedoms being taken away. All these little bit at a time anti-gun laws are starting to become, or have become, quite the infringement when added all together.

I’m very, very, very disappointed with Governor Martinez for going along with this crap.


22 posted on 02/09/2017 5:23:54 PM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

They keep talking about extending background checks to private sales, but if it’s going through an FFL, it’s not a private sale. IOW, they outlaw private sales. And that I can’t support.


23 posted on 02/09/2017 5:51:59 PM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Carthego delenda est

Well it hasn’t. gotten through to her desk - yet, but agree she hasn’t spoken out against it. She needs to take a position in opposition to this overreach.


24 posted on 02/09/2017 10:59:33 PM PST by CedarDave (Proud member of Hillary's Deplorables class of 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

She’s taken a position for it. One or another spokesperson of hers said a couple weeks ago that nothing has changed, she has the same position as before, in reference to the last time similar legislation was presented, in which she said she would sign it if it made it to her desk. Last time, the bills died in committee, fortunately.


25 posted on 02/10/2017 7:39:46 AM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson