Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firearms bill to face amendments (NM bills to outlaw private sales without background checks)
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | February 4, 2017 | Dan McKay

Posted on 02/09/2017 11:04:43 AM PST by CedarDave

SANTA FE – The sponsor of a firearms proposal working its way through the House says she’s willing to amend the bill so it applies to fewer law-abiding gun owners.

As it stands now, the proposal by Rep. Stephanie Garcia Richard, D-Los Alamos, would require background checks when people sell, lend or give firearms to one another in private transactions.

But she said Saturday that she wants to focus on gun sales, not lending a firearm to a neighbor or someone else for personal protection.

A similar bill, meanwhile, has cleared its first committee in the Senate.

Supporters and opponents turned out in force for Saturday’s three-and-a-half-hour hearing, held on the House floor to accommodate the large audience.

Cibola County Sheriff Tony Mace said the proposal will be impossible to enforce. Criminals, he said, generally get their weapons through theft or other illegal means.

“This bill does nothing to protect New Mexico,” Mace said. “The criminal element is going to obtain a weapon no matter how.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: banglist; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
NM Dems took control of the legislature last November. It is now much closer to California in composition - far-left libs and ecoradicals that believe fossil fuels should be banned (though they supply 1/3 of state revenue), taxes should be raised and the only enterprises supported should be cut-and-slice wind farms and bird-frying solar farms. And of course, everyone here should be able to vote even registering on election day. God help us in 2018 if we get another Dem governor like Richardson - we never recovered from his corrupt socialist-like administration.
1 posted on 02/09/2017 11:04:43 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Yes, the Democrats hope to make the entire nation look like Calif.


2 posted on 02/09/2017 11:05:47 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; OneWingedShark; CougarGA7; ...
A couple of days old, but still relevant.

NM list PING!

I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics

To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keywords

To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages

(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for anyone to use. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the article for free after answering a question or watching a short video commercial.)

3 posted on 02/09/2017 11:06:18 AM PST by CedarDave (Proud member of Hillary's Deplorables class of 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Our two US senators are both far-left eco-radical libs with more in common with west coast lib representatives than those in the mainstream. Interesting that Arizona is getting a new Intel facility while us in NM are constantly fighting to keep the plant in Rio Rancho from closing. Certainly a factor is that NM is always at the bottom, or nearly so, for education, poverty, jobs, etc. and at the top for crime and violence statistics per capita.


4 posted on 02/09/2017 11:15:09 AM PST by CedarDave (Proud member of Hillary's Deplorables class of 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Los Alamos denizen... Figures. There is a definite lack of objective reality up there. And they really aren’t part of New Mexico, they are more part of Kalifornia. (I am from there: it hasn’t changed, and had actually gotten worse over the years.)


5 posted on 02/09/2017 11:16:02 AM PST by LaRueLaDue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
God help us in 2018 if we get another Dem governor like Richardson - we never recovered from his corrupt socialist-like administration.

But, hey, you got a new train. Sure, the roads are falling apart, but - train!

6 posted on 02/09/2017 11:33:23 AM PST by Disambiguator (Keepin' it analog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Yes, we had a similar bill pass here in Washington state 2 years ago.

It's being ignored by gun owners.

Here on the conservative, East side, of the state, the Sheriffs ignore it too.

7 posted on 02/09/2017 11:44:01 AM PST by PROCON (Defending the Border isn't a Political Option, it's a Constitutional Obligation ~ Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

This is only enforceable if there is a database, registering all the guns in the state. Is that part of this law?


8 posted on 02/09/2017 11:48:20 AM PST by DesertRhino (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Hey - it must be working. In the entire two years there have been no arrests made in the entire state for breaking this rule. I mean, I know I NEVER switch firearms at the shooting club with my adult son.


9 posted on 02/09/2017 11:52:23 AM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts FDR's New Deal = obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I’m fine with doing background checks, so long as it doesn’t create a paper trail.


10 posted on 02/09/2017 11:55:23 AM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

The consequences of illegal immigration and why the wall is so badly needed.


11 posted on 02/09/2017 12:02:10 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Can your neighbor give you a gun for Valentine’s Day and you give him a heart shaped box of cash?


12 posted on 02/09/2017 12:03:18 PM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino; jdege; Tijeras_Slim
This is only enforceable if there is a database, registering all the guns in the state. Is that part of this law?

Don't know but suspect a paper trail for any sales that go through the federal background check. Otherwise no gun registry in NM that I know of. Checking with Tijeras Slim on these.

13 posted on 02/09/2017 12:07:21 PM PST by CedarDave (Proud member of Hillary's Deplorables class of 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration; CedarDave

Like an insidious virus, it’s infested the coasts and inland big cities, and is working its way slowly thru the heartland.


14 posted on 02/09/2017 12:23:07 PM PST by Carriage Hill ( Poor demoncrats haven't been this mad, since the Republicans took their slaves away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

The paper trail of a background check cannot enforce this law. Think of it this way. You are a cop and you suspect someone is in violation of this new transfer law. How do you prove they got the gun illegally from another state resident, unless you can prove who possessed what guns on the beginning date of the law?

If the state does not know what guns I possess and what guns you possess, I can sell you one. I could buy one of yours. They say “look, no paper trail from a fed background check”. You say I bought that one before the law passed.

Nobody will ever be able to prove a thing without a registration list. And that is where this is leading.


15 posted on 02/09/2017 12:27:30 PM PST by DesertRhino (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

There is no registration in NM now. But this law is impossible to enforce without one unless you catch someone in the act.


16 posted on 02/09/2017 12:28:41 PM PST by DesertRhino (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

...“This bill does nothing to protect New Mexico,” Mace said. “The criminal element is going to obtain a weapon no matter how.....

Billy the Kid must still be on the loose in New Mexico. I thought Pat Garrett took care of him.


17 posted on 02/09/2017 12:54:26 PM PST by Sasparilla ( I'm Not tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; DesertRhino; jdege

Although the politician says she’s interested in “sales”, the bill has not changed and would bar almost all “transfers” without a check (including loaning a buddy a hunting gun, handing another shooter at the range a gun to try unless you remain constantly in their presence.

It is similar to the law passed in NV recently which local law enforcement said is unenforcible. (Our NM Sheriffs have spoken out similarly). Also, NICS will not process these checks, as the FBI has deemed them a misuse of federal resources for state purposes.

Tomorrow there will be several groups headed to Santa Fe as the bill is before the Judiciary Committee. They plan to follow the anti-gun people around and speak to representatives after they do (the anti’s arguments are all emotion). Our contingent is from SASS (Single Action Shooting Society) and has a number of people who did this successfully in CA when it was headquartered there. They have a plan, materials, good arguments.

By focusing on the “transfer” side, they hope to peel a number of rural Democrats away. It’s a hard uphill climb, but these folks have experience. They even helped change some gun laws in Australia on a visit there.


18 posted on 02/09/2017 3:28:18 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I agree, backdoor registration.


19 posted on 02/09/2017 3:29:46 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

unenforceable


20 posted on 02/09/2017 3:31:54 PM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson