Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EarthResearcher333

Re post 2273 - do you suppose that there might have been 2 clay pipes running through that section of slab, but that one has been broken away? That almost looks too perfect for the pipe to have moved during the pour and still retained the round shape.


2,289 posted on 03/07/2017 6:57:36 AM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2273 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
"..do you suppose that there might have been 2 clay pipes running through that section of slab, but that one has been broken away? That almost looks too perfect for the pipe to have moved during the pour and still retained the round shape."

The cross-sectional area answers this.

(i.e. can't fit two adjacent pipes plus the gravel into this same cross-sectional [CS] volume).

The Polyethylene plastic sheet left a perfect forensic outline of the CS volume. What I suspect happened is that when the heavy concrete pour was vibrated, the plastic "tent" design deformed where the "marble like" round rock actually went under the drain pipe to the other side, forming the adjacent hump. That's how the plastic ended up wrapped around the one side of the drain pipe & no drain rock on that side - and most/all of the rock on the other side (an voila, the "hump").

This design is very unstable to overpour concrete & vibrate it - as you can see from the results.. I'm surprised someone didn't think of what would happen.

2,296 posted on 03/07/2017 10:34:59 AM PST by EarthResearcher333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2289 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson