Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GenXteacher

But polygamy can be pushed, based on the idea that “consenting adults” want to live their lives that way.

I wonder what the end game will be, and if I will live long enough to see it.

Now that we have normalized homosexual marriage, the next steps would seem to be some form of plural marriage.

I’ve heard that some LGBT types want to eventually see groups marriage, with any number of partners, any sex of the participating partners.

It might be beneficial if eventually the governmental entities, whether state government or federal government, simply get out of defining marriage, or providing any legal status to marriage at all. If the liberal judges are eventually going to force us all to recognize bizarre marriage and family structures, all in the name of “equality” and “fairness” and all that, we might just want to vote “no” and say there will no longer be marital status defined by government at all.


49 posted on 02/19/2017 9:36:53 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

It would be best if marriage were defined as one man, one woman, and that marriage was a social contract that could not be broken easily, and no other alternatives had any sanction.


56 posted on 02/19/2017 1:13:41 PM PST by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson