Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker
"I guess James didn’t want to bother editing down the hundreds of hours of raw footage?"

Because it takes away CNN's "spuriously edited footage" retort.

Which is exactly what Brian Stelter's spuriously edited CNNMoney preview story repeated twice regarding Project Veritas prior scalp-takings...

It is also because there is a recent successful model for releasing raw data: Wikileaks proved that group-sourcing thousands of people on Twitter to determine which of the Podesta emails were the most heinous/relevant in destroying Cankles' campaign.

39 posted on 02/23/2017 1:36:54 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Prosecute the win. Run up the score.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: StAnDeliver

No, they should release both a well-edited video and the raw backup.

And Wikileaks themselves have been looking at and trying to do more punchy reporting from their data, rather than just raw dumps.


40 posted on 02/23/2017 3:44:26 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson