To: Enlightened1
The majority concludes that the semiautomatic rifles banned by Maryland law are most useful in military service, even though they are not in regular use by any military force, including the United States Army, the decision said. Clearly they made this shit up as they went. What a freaking joke.
27 posted on
02/22/2017 6:08:01 PM PST by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: usconservative
Well they are dickheads,a Scoped Remington 700 is far more effective than a full auto, to hit most things.
Certainly more cost effective and stealthy
Full auto is good for suppressive fire, someone has to hit them
35 posted on
02/22/2017 6:20:00 PM PST by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: usconservative
I have not had time to read the decision, but the snippets posted should embarrass those who write such drivel. What is even more outrageous is that Harvie Wilkinson has in the past been mentioned as a possible SCOTUS pick, and was supposedly interviewed by W for nomination in ‘05, although I think his time has passed, fortunately.
45 posted on
02/22/2017 6:32:29 PM PST by
allblues
(God is neither a Republican nor a Democrat but Satan is definitely a Democrat)
To: usconservative
It is correct though, the military uses REAL, as defined, select fire weapons. A true interpretation of the 2nd would repeal prohibitions against our possession of those!
74 posted on
02/22/2017 10:18:13 PM PST by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson