Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buttons12; All

Well!

Yes. Hillary is “qualified” to win the mayor’s office.

But, is she capable of actually “doing” the job?

SHE has NEVER DONE ANYTHING.
Never run an office.
Never run a police station.
Never run a precinct, an administration, a department, nor an agency.
Never been responsible for DOING ANYTHING. EVER.
Campaigns? She was handed one - The NY Senate seat against an empty seat.
She lost the 2008 campaign against a junior senator who had no record.
She lost the 2016 campaign against a man who had run business empires, but had never run a political campaign.

Hilary’s only qualification for Mayor of New York City?
She is more corrupt than Tammany Hall.

But Tammany Hall was more competent.


48 posted on 02/26/2017 8:19:36 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
You do know that Tammany Hall was not an actual person but a political organization, right?

Anyway, I would not be so sure that mayor of NYC would be anymore of a "slam dunk" for Crooked Hillary than the presidency was (which she has now lost twice despite being declared both times as "inevitable").

Also, being a mayor of the biggest city in America is much more of a hands-on job. As you state, she just doesn't have the capability or experience to do the job effectively even if she did decide to run for it and wins it. She would be a disaster but NYC always finds a way to survive.

55 posted on 02/26/2017 9:07:38 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson