Posted on 02/26/2017 8:06:36 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Reading my mind.
“Ivanka is a screaming leftist”
Define “screaming leftist”.
Trump has often vouched for how she has influenced him. But just this week she was in the SBA meeting I described, and she reportedly has been in the congressional tax reform meetings directly—pushing for her new entitlement to be part of the new tax package. If the tax package is slowed and/or watered down and diverted/bogged down in a new entitlement as his initial legislation, I think “thwarted” will be accurate. Certainly “ton of influence” has already been demonstrated and claimed by POTUS himself.
Are you unfamiliar with her entitlement/tax, SBA program, climate change pursuit, and other liberal causes and efforts? Do I need to share some links with you? (Though you could of course also simply google them.)
Define “genuine conservative agenda”.
“Name one global warming thing Trump has initiated.”
We are still under the Paris climate “Treaty”, Ivanka hosted the rinos carbon tax summit, she brought in Gore and had DiCaprio put on a green jobs show. These things would not have happened without Ivanka. The situation is light years better then it would be had the witch one. My main point is Ivanka’s undeniable and arguably inappropriate liberal influence on Trump. No he hasn’t initiated any global warming “thing”, that’s not the point.
“Btw, didn’t we go through all this con-servative bull shit over the past 18 months?
Where have you great conservatives been for decades while the country declined into sh*t in every direction? Oh, I know where they’ve been! They were getting ready to elect yet another Boosh in 2016!”
Huh? You are making no sense to me. I am thrilled that Trump has been elected and was never a fan of any of the Bushes.
“she reportedly has been in the congressional tax reform meetings directly—pushing for her new entitlement to be part of the new tax package.”
Prove it.
.
Did you tell the MSM where you were dinning?
.
I don’t know what it is with some people, but they just can’t be happy.
Trump has done literally hundreds of things that we have wanted by now, and you still get the posts like that one, addressing something that may or may not be true as presented.
Me oh my, what will we ever do? (Hand wringing at 80% of capacity)
Uh huh. Sure you are.
Has named climate change as a pet issue, very concerned that women are not receiving equal pay, proposing a half-trillion-dollar new entitlement program for private childcare costs for parents earning up to half a million a year to the degree that is so important to her that she’s become involved in WH/congressional negotiations to try to make sure it is included in her father’s first tax legislation, attended an SBA meeting this week looking for programs that can be expanded, etc.
??
What does that mean? Who is reporting this?
You didn’t get the memo. Ivanka is not the President.
The point is that he HAS NOT initiated any new global warming things AND HAS stopped a lot of that nonsense in the U. S.
None the less here you are harping on something that is demonstrably incredibly better since he was elected.
Who needs Democrats to trash our president and his family, when some FReepers are are ever so thrilled to do it for them?
Name one thing Ivanka got him to do in our nation, that you didn’t want him to?
What global warming initiative did she get him to buy into in the U.S.?
So you obviously agree with this too, right? Have your thought about calling for Trumps impeachment?
You have no case to rebut the concerns re: Ivanka, so you try to push to some sort of ridiculous straw man argument.
Bannon repeated at CPAC this week that we should make our voices heard when and where the administration is straying from their promises and our ideals.
Expressing concern about Ivanka’s liberal initiatives within the administration is entirely in keeping with that. Nasty, fact-free watch dogs at FR are not doing Trump or the country any favors.
The child care was billed as revenue neutral. 500B is speculation. So much of this talk about Ivanka is pure speculation. I don’t believe in crucifying people based on speculation.
So you obviously agree with this from the other poster, right?
There’s no way for it to be revenue neutral without someone else paying for it with higher taxes. That is, others’ taxes have to be higher. What’s more, if becomes an EITC credit for those who aren’t making the money to recover their expenses through the special cut—and so it is an entitlement, not even simply a massive special interest payoff for those making up to half a mil a year. And legislation is always based on estimates and scoring.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.