[Art in Idaho]

There is one problem: Leaking is a felony. There is no legal basis for leaking to damage your political opponent, for any reason. It is simply beyond their pay grade. This appears to be a rationalization for criminal activity.

Yes it is. She comes across like, "It's okay if we do it. . We were doing it because of the awful Russians. . and BTW, we just happened to get "Trump staff dealing with the Russians" as a sidebar. Oh really.

Well Dr. Farkas, how did you get the information on "Trump staff dealing with the Russians?" Can you please explain that to us, under oath? And do you know any of the leakers? Were you one of the leakers? Could you kindly tell us who else was trying to get information to the Hill?

Would love to see Trey Gowdy question her. .

Found this: The Leakers Who Exposed Gen. Flynn’s Lie Committed Serious — and Wholly Justified — Felonies Find the leakers!

[The_Media_never_lie]

Please help me here: I have not seen any evidence of collusion between the Trump officials and the Russians, in spite of all the criminal leaking.

On Fox news tonight, Brit Hume said there was scant evidence, where scant can be taken to be meager. But is there any, other than imputed circumstantial evidence, such as some Russian computer with Trump corporate computer?

There is NO evidence, right?

[ROCKLOBSTER]

..Would love to see Trey Gowdy question her...

Well Dr. Farkas, how did you get the information on "Trump staff dealing with the Russians?" Can you please explain that to us, under oath? And do you know any of the leakers? Were you one of the leakers? Could you kindly tell us who else was trying to get information to the Hill?

She could "get dead" unexpectedly.