Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mom MD; vladimir998
Nancy Pelosi is not, and does not present herself in public as, the founder or reformer of Catholicism.

In fact the man who, earlier in the 21st century, was the equivalent of "Catholic Chief Justice" (Card. Raymond Burke, head of the Roman Apostolic Signatura) said she and other public abortion enthusiasts are not to receive Communion because they are not "in" communion. A ruling which, to date, has not been rescinded.

So while Luther may, to some extent, be considered a key exemplar of "Lutheranism," Pelosi cannot be invoked as even poorly "representing" Catholicism.

Although perhaps, like Luther, she would like to either reform it, or, failing that, split it and wreck it.

66 posted on 04/01/2017 9:22:19 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is. -Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

I was responding to a post about modern day Lutheran heresy I don’t wish to argue with you as I respect you but the popes and “princes of the church” in luthers time were just as antisemitic and racist two wrongs do not make a right all were equally guilty and it still has nothing to do with the reformation


67 posted on 04/01/2017 9:29:26 AM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson