Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRUMP: 'If China is not going to solve North Korea, we will'
Business Insider ^ | April 2, 2017 | Timothy Ahman and Valerie Volcovici, Reuters

Posted on 04/02/2017 12:47:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The United States is prepared to respond to North Korean nuclear threats on its own if China fails to pressure Pyongyang, President Donald Trump said in an interview with the Financial Times on Sunday.

"Well if China is not going to solve North Korea, We will. That is all I am telling you," he was quoted as telling the newspaper....

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: china; korea; nuclearweapons; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 04/02/2017 12:47:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

China doesn’t seem to get it. A nuclear capable guy like Kim on your border, is as easily a threat to you as he is to South Korea, Japan, and the United States.

Before this is over, he may serve as our proxy before being China’s against us.


2 posted on 04/02/2017 12:51:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“China”, ie the ChiComs, won’t like that. They don’t want to solve the Nork problem.

If they can get rid of the Norks, Chinese people will think they can get rid of the ChiComs also.

There are asymmetrical warfare considerations also.


3 posted on 04/02/2017 12:53:18 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How bout solving the fuching islam jihadi rapefugees coming in here, too?

Dammit.


4 posted on 04/02/2017 12:53:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I have been expecting Trump to eliminate the NK missiles on the launching pad.

The last time, they went in the general direction of our ally, Japan.

China is not going to confront the US militarily until they are fully prepared. Not there yet.


5 posted on 04/02/2017 12:57:50 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

6 posted on 04/02/2017 12:59:44 PM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Actually get Congress out of the way and things will get done....both parties are concerned with themselves and not the threats to this country or it’s people.


7 posted on 04/02/2017 12:59:48 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Disestablishmentarian

I agree about China’s intentions, but that doesn’t mean they’ll reign in North Korea or Iran. I mention Iran because Korea has been sharing tech with Iran. I think Iran is part of China’s long term plan, even if Russia has pull there.


8 posted on 04/02/2017 1:03:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It is likely kim dung will have or already has missiles capable of reaching the US. However the distance/time involved will make it unlikely to reach the US before destruction by friendly forces. IMO
9 posted on 04/02/2017 1:04:12 PM PDT by chief lee runamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why us?

South Korea is right there. Let them handle it.


10 posted on 04/02/2017 1:05:05 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Xi and Trump will meet Thursday and Friday of this week.

This will be the most important two-days of this presidency, yet, in my humble opinion.

North Korea is important, but so is the trade relationship between China and America.

We are currently being terribly abused, in the trade relationship. This in my opinion is the real issue between the two countries.

This will be an important week, in my opinion.


11 posted on 04/02/2017 1:05:33 PM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Always good advice.
12 posted on 04/02/2017 1:05:47 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RC one

I think Trump would rather have China stop North Korea.

Hence the talking. In this instance, a well made statement could have as much effect as a military strike.

In general, I do agree with your thought there.


13 posted on 04/02/2017 1:06:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What? The site of your next underground nuclear test exploded before you could set off your nuke? That's a shame.

14 posted on 04/02/2017 1:12:26 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chiefly Runamok
It is likely kim dung will have or already has missiles capable of reaching the US. However the distance/time involved will make it unlikely to reach the US before destruction by friendly forces. IMO

Agreed that he may already have them or soon will, but stopping them once they're launched is harder than you seem to think. Maybe not impossible, but it's far from a sure thing, especially if they are able to launch several at once. Time from launch to impact is around 30 minutes, and they move at about 17,000 miles per hour, which is far faster than any of our interceptors.

15 posted on 04/02/2017 1:13:49 PM PDT by xjcsa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The fat crazy kid.


16 posted on 04/02/2017 1:23:27 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Happy Nobama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Why us?
South Korea is right there. Let them handle it.


South Korea doesn’t want to feed the millions of NK refugees that would head south afterwards.


17 posted on 04/02/2017 1:24:47 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ve long thought that a good solution to the 2 Koreas was to rejoin them on the condition that Korea would remain a neutral border state between China and the US not aligned with either nation. I hope Trump is able to work out a solution like that.


18 posted on 04/02/2017 1:24:48 PM PDT by RedWulf (#purge the nevertrumpers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Excellent.

The fat boy has viewed America as a weak and impotent enemy. Under Obama he was correct but this is the time of Trump


19 posted on 04/02/2017 1:29:09 PM PDT by WashingtonFire (President Trump - it's like having your dad as President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

For China, North Korea IS the solution. North Korea is effectively the Great Wall for China.


20 posted on 04/02/2017 1:30:18 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Enforce the Law. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson