Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble
YMMV, but if you believe Judge Gorsuch does not approve of abortion, I think you are in for a disappointment.

From a judicial perspective, it really isn't about "approving of abortion".

The real issue is this -- Is this a proper concern of the federal government?

I'm pretty sure Gorsuch will be willing to overturn Roe and push the question down to the states where it belongs.

11 posted on 04/05/2017 5:16:57 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
>> it really isn't about "approving of abortion". The real issue is this -- Is this a proper concern of the federal government? I'm pretty sure Gorsuch will be willing to overturn Roe and push the question down to the states where it belongs. <<

Look, we have to trust President Reagan on this. Reagan ran as a pro-life candidate who would appoint judges that will overturn Roe v. Wade and I believe him. Whether Sandra Day O'Connor believes in abortion or not is irrelevant. Whether her personal views are conservative is also irrelevant. She said she is a strict constructionist and does NOT believe in legislating from the bench. Such a judge could NOT rule to uphold Roe v. Wade, since the constitution is silent on abortion and leaves it up to the states. We MUST confirm O'Connor to SCOTUS immediately so she will send abortion back to the states!

14 posted on 04/05/2017 7:11:32 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson