Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KC_Lion

It’s funny to read all of the objections to people having “multiple partners” but what most of them object to is the idea of multiple partners >at the same time<.

Serial monogamists like our President (who I support) are acceptable to these people even though his multiple marriages would offend them only if the marriages were concurrent. But because they’re consecutive it’s somehow acceptable.

And of course it’s still socially acceptable for single men to have as many sexual partners as they possibly can and that remains acceptable. Some of them are even celebrated for having multiple casual partners at the same time.

But if they commit to these multiple partners and commit to taking responsibility for the children they create then that makes them evil?

Seems to me that committed polygamy is far less of a threat to society than is the selective morality that eats away at the foundations of our civilization.


36 posted on 04/13/2017 8:58:45 AM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MeganC

The problem with committed polygamy is it takes several desirables “off the market” who otherwise would be available to others who now faced diminished prospects. And there’s a severe bias in that arrangement toward one male & multiple females, as the “one” can service all others and share identifiable offspring relationships ... vs the reverse arrangement, where multiple men are sitting around wondering why they’re sacrificing for offspring who isn’t identifiably theirs.


45 posted on 04/13/2017 9:45:25 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: MeganC

It’s funny to read all of the objections to people having “multiple partners” but what most of them object to is the idea of multiple partners >at the same time<.

Serial monogamists like our President (who I support) are acceptable to these people even though his multiple marriages would offend them only if the marriages were concurrent. But because they’re consecutive it’s somehow acceptable.


It does not matter to Nature whether the intimate contact with multiple partners is concurrent or consecutive. Then we’re just talking about levels of risk.

And what is considered ‘acceptable’ in a fleeting moment in a given place is also irrelevant to certain Laws that will be obeyed or risk extinction. A culture also is subject to Survival of the Fittest. If we persist in fostering a value system [or lack, thereof] that selects our society for extinction, Nature will oblige.

Regardless of whether it is multiple opposite or same-sex, regardless of how many people are in the intimate relationship, the same fundamental rule applies: Being a person who has intimate contact with multiple partners who themselves also have multiple partners is guaranteed not to last w/o negative consequence.

Period.

Nature cannot be cajoled, manipulated, cheated, deceived, bullied, etc. We cannot do whatever we want. We will correct our own self-destructive behavior or we shall be Corrected.


59 posted on 04/13/2017 10:11:00 AM PDT by walford (https://www.facebook.com/wralford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson