[joesbucks]

so in the Art of the Deal, you change your statements based on whether you need the entity or not? In other words, China was to be labeled a currency manipulator. Either they are or aren't. If they still are, then he didn't tell the truth when he said they no longer were.

If he said NATO is not relevant, then either he misspoke or didn't tell the truth again, as now he realizes they do have a purpose. Yes, paying their fair share is important, but the relevance is not whether they pay their fair share but whether the alliance is needed and practical. If they hadn't ponied up, would he bailed on them?

When is this soon on health care you speak of?

[hotsteppa]

Trump is bargaining from a position of strength in both China and NATO scenarios and the results so far is consistent with his America first attitude. As for health care, Rome wasn’t built in a day. Patience.

[proud American in Canada]

With all due respect, don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

The NK situation is pressing. Apparently their missiles can reach the US. They can certainly reach South Korea.